EBAY
eBay Inc.
EBAY has the edge over GT overall, supported by stronger fundamentals and lower modeled downside.
GT
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
GT offers stronger valuation, but that advantage does not outweigh its weaker overall profile.
EBAY Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Healthy | |
| Strong | |
| Stable |
EBAY's revenue, profitability and cash flow are currently healthy, and its balance sheet is stable.
GT Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Stable | |
| Under pressure | |
| Stable | |
| Weak |
GT's revenue and cash flow are currently stable, but its profitability and balance sheet are under pressure.
EBAY PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap | 6.9x | $31.50 | -74% |
| Fair | 16x | $71.96 | -40% |
| Forward | 18x | $120 | — |
| Expensive | 22x | $99.04 | -18% |
| Current | 26x | $120 | — |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
EBAY's PE is in its expensive range at 26x. If earnings grow as analysts expect, today's price would be 18x next year's earnings.
GT PE Valuation
GT has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
EBAY Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| Strongly improving | |
| Growth | |
| Growth | |
| Stable | |
| Moderate | |
| Moderate |
EBAY has the edge over GT on the outlook, with more favorable earnings and revenue expectations.
GT Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| -- | |
| Losses steady | |
| Stable | |
| Stable | |
| Limited | |
| Low |
Analysts expect GT's earnings, revenue and profitability to hold roughly steady. However, they disagree widely on these estimates.
EBAY Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $6.63 | +45% |
| Q3 2026 | $4.57 | +0.4% |
| Q2 2026 | $4.82 | +7.3% |
| Q1 2026 | $4.40 | +6% |
| Q4 2025 | $4.34 | +10% |
| Q3 2025 | $4.55 | +15% |
| Q2 2025 | $4.49 | -12% |
| Q1 2025 | $4.15 | -17% |
| Q4 2024 | $3.94 | -24% |
EBAY has the edge over GT on earnings quality, reporting a profit while its opponent remains loss making.
GT Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$2.03 | +$4.06 |
| Q2 2026 | -$8.83 | -726% |
| Q1 2026 | -$7.25 | -963% |
| Q4 2025 | -$5.99 | -2596% |
| Q3 2025 | -$6.09 | -$5.04 |
| Q2 2025 | $1.41 | +$2.65 |
| Q1 2025 | $0.84 | +$3.11 |
| Q4 2024 | $0.24 | +$2.66 |
GT lost $2.03 per share over the past year, a smaller loss than the year before.
EBAY Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $3.2B | +14% |
| Q2 2026 | $3.1B | +15% |
| Q1 2026 | $3.1B | +19% |
| Q4 2025 | $3B | +15% |
| Q3 2025 | $2.8B | +9.5% |
| Q2 2025 | $2.7B | +6.1% |
| Q1 2025 | $2.6B | +1.1% |
| Q4 2024 | $2.6B | +0.7% |
EBAY has the edge over GT on sales, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 19% | -1.2 points |
| Q2 2026 | 22% | +3.8 points |
| Q1 2026 | 20% | -4 points |
| Q4 2025 | 20% | -0.8 points |
| Q3 2025 | 20% | -2.7 points |
| Q2 2025 | 18% | -3.6 points |
| Q1 2025 | 24% | -0.9 points |
| Q4 2024 | 21% | +5.1 points |
EBAY has the edge over GT on profitability, with a higher operating margin.
GT Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $4.5B | -2.3% |
| Q2 2026 | $4.3B | -4.8% |
| Q1 2026 | $3.9B | -8.7% |
| Q4 2025 | $4.9B | -0.6% |
| Q3 2025 | $4.6B | -3.7% |
| Q2 2025 | $4.5B | -2.3% |
| Q1 2025 | $4.3B | -6.3% |
| Q4 2024 | $4.9B | -3.3% |
GT's revenue fell from its 2022 peak and has held roughly level since: $4.5B last quarter, down 2.3% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -4.7% | +11 points |
| Q2 2026 | -3.8% | -11 points |
| Q1 2026 | -4.6% | -7.7 points |
| Q4 2025 | 3.3% | +1.5 points |
| Q3 2025 | -16% | -15 points |
| Q2 2025 | 6.8% | +3.8 points |
| Q1 2025 | 3.1% | +4.2 points |
| Q4 2024 | 1.9% | +7.9 points |
GT's operating margin was −4.7% last quarter, up 11 points from the same quarter a year ago.
EBAY Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $749M | -6.7% |
| Q2 2026 | $300M | +$741M |
| Q1 2026 | $897M | +39% |
| Q4 2025 | $466M | -17% |
| Q3 2025 | $803M | +24% |
| Q2 2025 | -$441M | -259% |
| Q1 2025 | $644M | +36% |
| Q4 2024 | $560M | +$564M |
EBAY has the edge over GT on cash flow, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
GT Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$283M | -$102M |
| Q2 2026 | -$69M | +$318M |
| Q1 2026 | -$893M | -$96M |
| Q4 2025 | $1.3B | +32% |
| Q3 2025 | -$181M | +$170M |
| Q2 2025 | -$387M | -$4M |
| Q1 2025 | -$797M | -$28M |
| Q4 2024 | $1B | +2% |
GT's free cash flow has turned positive after six years mostly in the red: $90M over the past year.
EBAY Total Shares
| Period | Change % | Net change |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly | -0.4% | -2M shares |
| 1 year | -3% | -14M shares |
| 3 years | -15% | -79M shares |
| 5 years | -31% | -205M shares |
| Available history | -44% | -359M shares |
EBAY has the edge over GT on shareholder dilution, with a more favorable share count trend.
| Quarter | Spent |
|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $664M |
| Q2 2026 | $323M |
| Q1 2026 | $486M |
| Q4 2025 | $635M |
| Q3 2025 | $626M |
| Q2 2025 | $624M |
| Q1 2025 | $615M |
| Q4 2024 | $911M |
EBAY spent $2.1B buying back its own shares over the past year, down 24% from the year before.
GT Total Shares
| Period | Change % | Net change |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly | 0% | -- |
| 1 year | +0.3% | +1M shares |
| 3 years | +1.4% | +4M shares |
| 5 years | +17% | +42M shares |
| Available history | +24% | +56M shares |
GT has 289M diluted shares, about the same as a year ago.
| Quarter | Spent |
|---|---|
| Q4 2019 | — |
EBAY Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 1.9x | Healthy |
| Q2 2026 | 1.5x | Healthy |
| Q1 2026 | 1.4x | Healthy |
| Q4 2025 | 1.8x | Healthy |
| Q3 2025 | 1.7x | Healthy |
| Q2 2025 | 1.8x | Healthy |
| Q1 2025 | 1.4x | Healthy |
| Q4 2024 | 1.9x | Healthy |
EBAY has the edge over GT on leverage, with a lower net debt burden relative to earnings.
GT Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 11.4x | High |
| Q2 2026 | 97.4x | High |
| Q1 2026 | 11.0x | High |
| Q4 2025 | 5.9x | High |
| Q3 2025 | 8.5x | High |
| Q2 2025 | 4.6x | High |
| Q1 2025 | 5.2x | High |
| Q4 2024 | 5.8x | High |
GT's net debt is about 11 years of its operating earnings (EBITDA), up from 8.5 years a year ago.
EBAY Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 61.9 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 80.0 | Overbought |
EBAY's weekly RSI is 62 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 80 (overbought).
GT Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 28.3 | Oversold |
| Stochastic | 7.1 | Oversold |
GT's weekly RSI is 28 (oversold) and its Stochastic is 7 (oversold).
EBAY PE vs Consumer Cyclical Sector
| Metric | EBAY | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 26x | 18x | 46% above |
| PE % | 91 | 47 | 44 pts above |
EBAY is trading at 26x earnings, a 46% premium to the Consumer Cyclical sector's median of 18x.
GT PE vs Consumer Cyclical Sector
| Metric | GT | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | N/A | 18x | — |
GT has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
EBAY Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $116.5 | 3.1% above |
| 20 week MA | $112.4 | 6.9% above |
| 50 week MA | $102.6 | 17% above |
| 100 week MA | $89.8 | 34% above |
| 200 week MA | $69.5 | 73% above |
EBAY has the edge over GT on trend strength, trading above more of its moving averages.
GT Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $4.49 | 10% below |
| 20 week MA | $5.61 | 28% below |
| 50 week MA | $6.84 | 41% below |
| 100 week MA | $8.05 | 50% below |
| 200 week MA | $9.96 | 60% below |
GT is in a downtrend: it's below all five of its weekly moving averages, and 60% below its 200-week average.
EBAY Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $36.1 | $50.1 | +39% |
| 2021 | $50.1 | $64.9 | +29% |
| 2022 | $64.9 | $40.2 | -38% |
| 2023 | $40.2 | $43.6 | +8.6% |
| 2024 | $43.6 | $62.8 | +44% |
| 2025 | $62.8 | $85.2 | +36% |
| 2026 YTD | $85.2 | $120.1 | +41% |
EBAY has the edge over GT on returns for 2026, with the stronger performance.
GT Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $15.1 | $10.4 | -31% |
| 2021 | $10.4 | $21.1 | +103% |
| 2022 | $21.1 | $10.2 | -51% |
| 2023 | $10.2 | $14.3 | +40% |
| 2024 | $14.3 | $8.85 | -38% |
| 2025 | $8.85 | $8.73 | -1.4% |
| 2026 YTD | $8.73 | $4.03 | -54% |
GT's yearly returns have swung widely, from +103% in 2021 to −51% in 2022. It's down 54% so far in 2026.