CCB
Coastal Financial Corporation
CCB offers stronger modeled upside, but that advantage does not outweigh its weaker overall profile.
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
GS has the edge over CCB overall, supported by stronger fundamentals and lower modeled downside.
CCB Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Under pressure | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
CCB's revenue is currently healthy, but its profitability is under pressure. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like CCB.
GS Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Strong | |
| Strong | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
GS's revenue and profitability are currently strong. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like GS.
CCB PE Valuation
CCB has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
GS PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap | 7.6x | $528 | -42% |
| Current | 13x | $914 | — |
| Forward | 13x | $914 | — |
| Fair | 14x | $940 | +2.9% |
| Expensive | 17x | $1,214 | +33% |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
GS's PE is 13x, but its earnings don't support one, so it isn't a reliable read right now.
CCB Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| -- | |
| Growth | |
| Growth | |
| Improving | |
| Limited | |
| Moderate |
Analysts expect earnings and revenue growth for CCB, with profitability improving.
GS Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| Stable | |
| Strong growth | |
| Growth | |
| Strongly improving | |
| Limited | |
| Low |
Analysts expect earnings and revenue growth for GS, with profitability improving. However, they disagree widely on these estimates.
CCB Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $4.69 | — |
| Q3 2026 | -$0.25 | -108% |
| Q2 2026 | -$0.26 | -108% |
| Q1 2026 | $3.21 | -5.3% |
| Q4 2025 | $3.06 | -6.1% |
| Q3 2025 | $3.17 | +6.7% |
| Q2 2025 | $3.26 | +19% |
| Q1 2025 | $3.39 | +19% |
| Q4 2024 | $3.26 | -0.3% |
CCB has swung to a loss: it lost $0.25 per share over the past year, after a profit the year before.
GS Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $72.35 | +4% |
| Q3 2026 | $69.58 | +41% |
| Q2 2026 | $64.82 | +43% |
| Q1 2026 | $54.75 | +27% |
| Q4 2025 | $51.32 | +27% |
| Q3 2025 | $49.22 | +44% |
| Q2 2025 | $45.37 | +45% |
| Q1 2025 | $43.08 | +68% |
| Q4 2024 | $40.54 | +77% |
GS has the edge over CCB on earnings quality, reporting a profit while its opponent remains loss making.
CCB Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $149.3M | +3.2% |
| Q2 2026 | $178.1M | +49% |
| Q1 2026 | $149.4M | +7.1% |
| Q4 2025 | $138M | -5.8% |
| Q3 2025 | $144.7M | -5% |
| Q2 2025 | $119.4M | -12% |
| Q1 2025 | $139.5M | -5.6% |
| Q4 2024 | $146.5M | +18% |
CCB's revenue is growing: $149M last quarter, up 3.2% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 12% | 0 points |
| Q2 2026 | -31% | -43 points |
| Q1 2026 | 9.8% | +1.3 points |
| Q4 2025 | 12% | +0.7 points |
| Q3 2025 | 12% | +1.6 points |
| Q2 2025 | 12% | +1 points |
| Q1 2025 | 8.4% | +2.5 points |
| Q4 2024 | 12% | +2.2 points |
CCB's operating margin was 12% last quarter, about level with the same quarter a year ago.
GS Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $18.7B | +23% |
| Q2 2026 | $20.3B | +39% |
| Q1 2026 | $17.2B | +14% |
| Q4 2025 | $13.5B | -3% |
| Q3 2025 | $15.2B | +20% |
| Q2 2025 | $14.6B | +15% |
| Q1 2025 | $15.1B | +6% |
| Q4 2024 | $13.9B | +23% |
GS has the edge over CCB on sales, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 37% | +2 points |
| Q2 2026 | 42% | +8.1 points |
| Q1 2026 | 38% | +0.2 points |
| Q4 2025 | 44% | +5.6 points |
| Q3 2025 | 36% | +4.1 points |
| Q2 2025 | 34% | +3.2 points |
| Q1 2025 | 37% | +0.6 points |
| Q4 2024 | 38% | +18 points |
GS has the edge over CCB on profitability, with a higher operating margin.
CCB Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $39.6M | -31% |
| Q2 2026 | $74.6M | +17% |
| Q1 2026 | $74.1M | +7.6% |
| Q4 2025 | $55.9M | -14% |
| Q3 2025 | $57.4M | -5.8% |
| Q2 2025 | $64M | -8.5% |
| Q1 2025 | $68.9M | +15% |
| Q4 2024 | $65.3M | +36% |
CCB has the edge over GS on cash generation, producing positive trailing cash flow while its opponent burns cash.
GS Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $3.7B | +72% |
| Q2 2026 | $5.6B | +7.8% |
| Q1 2026 | -$32.4B | +$5.3B |
| Q4 2025 | -$16.8B | -136% |
| Q3 2025 | $2.1B | +$40.6B |
| Q2 2025 | $5.2B | -6.8% |
| Q1 2025 | -$37.7B | -$9.2B |
| Q4 2024 | $46.2B | +$75.1B |
GS's free cash flow was −$40B over the past year, against $15.8B the year before. Free cash flow isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like GS.
CCB Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 7.8x | High |
| Q2 2026 | 7.6x | High |
| Q1 2026 | 0.6x | Very low |
| Q4 2025 | 0.9x | Very low |
| Q3 2025 | 0.9x | Very low |
| Q2 2025 | 1.0x | Very low |
| Q1 2025 | 0.7x | Very low |
| Q4 2024 | 0.9x | Very low |
CCB's net debt is about 7.8 years of its operating earnings (EBITDA), up from less than a year a year ago. Net leverage isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like CCB.
GS Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -5.4x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2026 | -6.1x | Net Cash |
| Q1 2026 | -6.7x | Net Cash |
| Q4 2025 | -6.4x | Net Cash |
| Q3 2025 | -3.5x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2025 | -3.1x | Net Cash |
| Q1 2025 | -3.9x | Net Cash |
| Q4 2024 | -4.7x | Net Cash |
GS has the edge over CCB on leverage, with a lower net debt burden relative to earnings.
CCB Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 35.3 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 35.0 | Neutral |
CCB's weekly RSI is 35 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 35 (neutral).
GS Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 44.5 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 16.3 | Oversold |
GS's weekly RSI is 45 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 16 (oversold).
CCB PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | CCB | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | N/A | 13x | — |
CCB has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
GS PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | GS | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 13x | 13x | 0.8% above |
| PE % | 46 | 63 | 17 pts below |
GS is trading at 13x earnings, in line with the Financial Services sector's median of 13x, though its earnings don't support one.
CCB Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $42.8 | 1.1% above |
| 20 week MA | $51.4 | 16% below |
| 50 week MA | $73.0 | 41% below |
| 100 week MA | $84.0 | 48% below |
| 200 week MA | $64.5 | 33% below |
CCB has bounced recently, but its long-term trend is still down: it's above its 8-week average, but 33% below its 200-week average.
GS Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $895.5 | 2% above |
| 20 week MA | $977.4 | 6.5% below |
| 50 week MA | $945.4 | 3.4% below |
| 100 week MA | $804.5 | 14% above |
| 200 week MA | $602.7 | 52% above |
GS has the edge over CCB on trend strength, trading above more of its moving averages.
CCB Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $16.7 | $21.4 | +28% |
| 2021 | $21.4 | $52.0 | +144% |
| 2022 | $52.0 | $47.6 | -8.5% |
| 2023 | $47.6 | $44.4 | -6.7% |
| 2024 | $44.4 | $83.7 | +89% |
| 2025 | $83.7 | $116.9 | +40% |
| 2026 YTD | $116.9 | $43.2 | -63% |
CCB is down 63% so far in 2026, after finishing higher in four of the previous six years.
GS Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $230.7 | $256.2 | +11% |
| 2021 | $256.2 | $385.0 | +50% |
| 2022 | $385.0 | $345.5 | -10% |
| 2023 | $345.5 | $385.8 | +12% |
| 2024 | $385.8 | $576.2 | +49% |
| 2025 | $576.2 | $907.0 | +57% |
| 2026 YTD | $907.0 | $913.6 | +0.7% |
GS has the edge over CCB on returns for 2026, with the stronger performance.