TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
TUSK trails on the overall score without a compensating advantage in the available component scores.
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co
VRT has the edge over TUSK overall, supported by stronger fundamentals and stronger modeled upside.
TUSK Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Under pressure | |
| Healthy | |
| Weak | |
| Strong |
TUSK's profitability and balance sheet are currently healthy, but its revenue and cash flow are under pressure.
VRT Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Strong | |
| Strong | |
| Strong | |
| Strong |
VRT's revenue, profitability, cash flow and balance sheet are all currently strong.
TUSK PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap | 7.9x | $2.30 | -30% |
| Current | 11x | $3.26 | — |
| Fair | 14x | $4.08 | +25% |
| Expensive | 28x | $8.11 | +149% |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
TUSK's PE is in its cheap range at 11x.
VRT PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward | 23x | $210 | — |
| Current | 39x | $210 | — |
| Cheap | 58x | $308 | +47% |
| Fair | 72x | $383 | +83% |
| Expensive | 88x | $472 | +125% |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
VRT has the edge over TUSK in the historical PE scenario, which offers more potential upside but is not a forecast.
TUSK Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| -- | |
| Losses growing | |
| Strong growth | |
| Strongly weakening | |
| Limited | |
| High |
Analysts expect TUSK's losses to grow, with revenue growing.
VRT Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| Strongly improving | |
| Strong growth | |
| Strong growth | |
| Strongly improving | |
| Moderate | |
| Moderate |
VRT has the edge over TUSK on the outlook, with more favorable earnings and profitability expectations.
TUSK Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $0.29 | +$0.69 |
| Q2 2026 | $0.02 | +$0.66 |
| Q1 2026 | $0.21 | +$4.28 |
| Q4 2025 | $0.09 | +$4.40 |
| Q3 2025 | -$0.40 | +$3.73 |
| Q2 2025 | -$0.64 | +$3.01 |
| Q1 2025 | -$4.07 | -$3.58 |
| Q4 2024 | -$4.31 | -$4.24 |
TUSK has returned to profit: it earned $0.29 per share over the past year, after losing money the year before.
VRT Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $9.14 | +71% |
| Q3 2026 | $5.35 | +102% |
| Q2 2026 | $4.42 | +111% |
| Q1 2026 | $3.98 | +131% |
| Q4 2025 | $3.41 | +166% |
| Q3 2025 | $2.65 | +75% |
| Q2 2025 | $2.09 | +62% |
| Q1 2025 | $1.72 | +64% |
| Q4 2024 | $1.28 | +7.6% |
VRT has the edge over TUSK on earnings, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
TUSK Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $21.3M | +44% |
| Q2 2026 | $26.1M | +59% |
| Q1 2026 | $22M | -65% |
| Q3 2025 | $14.8M | -63% |
| Q2 2025 | $16.4M | -68% |
| Q1 2025 | $62.5M | +45% |
| Q4 2024 | $53.2M | +0.8% |
| Q3 2024 | $40M | -38% |
TUSK's revenue is recovering but still below its 2023 peak: $21M last quarter, up 44% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -2% | +59 points |
| Q2 2026 | 10% | +232 points |
| Q1 2026 | -3.9% | -4.8 points |
| Q3 2025 | -61% | -30 points |
| Q2 2025 | -222% | -38 points |
| Q1 2025 | 0.8% | +29 points |
| Q4 2024 | -18% | -4.6 points |
| Q3 2024 | -31% | -18 points |
TUSK's operating margin was −2% last quarter, up 220 points from the same quarter a year ago.
VRT Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $4.3B | +61% |
| Q2 2026 | $3.3B | +24% |
| Q1 2026 | $2.6B | +30% |
| Q4 2025 | $2.9B | +23% |
| Q3 2025 | $2.7B | +29% |
| Q2 2025 | $2.6B | +35% |
| Q1 2025 | $2B | +24% |
| Q4 2024 | $2.3B | +26% |
VRT has the edge over TUSK on sales, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 23% | +3.5 points |
| Q2 2026 | 19% | +2.7 points |
| Q1 2026 | 17% | +2.3 points |
| Q4 2025 | 20% | +0.7 points |
| Q3 2025 | 19% | +1.4 points |
| Q2 2025 | 17% | -0.4 points |
| Q1 2025 | 14% | +1.9 points |
| Q4 2024 | 19% | +4.2 points |
VRT has the edge over TUSK on profitability, with a higher operating margin.
TUSK Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$41.8M | -$25.2M |
| Q2 2026 | -$51M | -$18.3M |
| Q1 2026 | -$14.7M | -$10.2M |
| Q4 2025 | -$35.4M | -127% |
| Q3 2025 | -$16.6M | -$13.4M |
| Q2 2025 | -$32.6M | -$20.9M |
| Q1 2025 | -$4.5M | -110% |
| Q4 2024 | $130.5M | +5562% |
TUSK has burned cash in most quarters: −$143M over the past year, against $77M the year before.
VRT Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $654.9M | +41% |
| Q2 2026 | $926.5M | +233% |
| Q1 2026 | $654.2M | +145% |
| Q4 2025 | $885.6M | +143% |
| Q3 2025 | $463.5M | +36% |
| Q2 2025 | $277.9M | -19% |
| Q1 2025 | $266.8M | +162% |
| Q4 2024 | $364.5M | +18% |
VRT has the edge over TUSK on cash generation, producing positive trailing cash flow while its opponent burns cash.
TUSK Total Shares
| Period | Change % | Net change |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly | -0.1% | -36K shares |
| 1 year | -0.5% | -230K shares |
| 3 years | +0.4% | +186K shares |
| 5 years | +3.1% | +1.4M shares |
| Available history | +6.9% | +3.1M shares |
TUSK has the edge over VRT on shareholder dilution, with a more favorable share count trend.
| Quarter | Spent |
|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | — |
| Q2 2026 | $130,000 |
| Q1 2026 | $404,000 |
| Q4 2025 | — |
TUSK spent $534,000 buying back its own shares over the past year.
VRT Total Shares
| Period | Change % | Net change |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly | 0% | -64.9K shares |
| 1 year | +0.4% | +1.8M shares |
| 3 years | +1.1% | +4.4M shares |
| 5 years | +10% | +36M shares |
| Available history | +63% | +152M shares |
VRT has 393M diluted shares, about the same as a year ago.
| Quarter | Spent |
|---|---|
| Q4 2025 | — |
| Q3 2025 | — |
| Q2 2025 | — |
| Q1 2025 | — |
| Q4 2024 | — |
| Q3 2024 | — |
| Q2 2024 | — |
| Q1 2024 | $599.9M |
TUSK Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -0.4x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2026 | -2.1x | Net Cash |
| Q1 2024 | 35.8x | High |
| Q4 2023 | 1.1x | Healthy |
| Q3 2023 | 1.6x | Healthy |
| Q2 2023 | 0.9x | Very low |
| Q1 2023 | 1.2x | Healthy |
| Q4 2022 | 1.6x | Healthy |
TUSK has the edge over VRT on leverage, with a lower net debt burden relative to earnings.
VRT Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -0.2x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2026 | 0.1x | Very low |
| Q1 2026 | 0.3x | Very low |
| Q4 2025 | 0.6x | Very low |
| Q3 2025 | 0.8x | Very low |
| Q2 2025 | 0.7x | Very low |
| Q1 2025 | 0.8x | Very low |
| Q4 2024 | 1.0x | Healthy |
VRT has more cash than debt.
TUSK Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 57.8 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 63.9 | Neutral |
TUSK's weekly RSI is 58 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 64 (neutral).
VRT Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 43.0 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 26.4 | Neutral |
VRT's weekly RSI is 43 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 26 (neutral).
TUSK PE vs Industrials Sector
| Metric | TUSK | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11x | 24x | 53% below |
| PE % | 32 | 58 | 26 pts below |
TUSK has the edge over VRT on valuation relative to its sector.
VRT PE vs Industrials Sector
| Metric | VRT | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 39x | 24x | 63% above |
| PE % | 3 | 58 | 55 pts below |
VRT is trading at 39x earnings, a 63% premium to the Industrials sector's median of 24x.
TUSK Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $2.94 | 11% above |
| 20 week MA | $2.99 | 9% above |
| 50 week MA | $2.69 | 21% above |
| 100 week MA | $2.59 | 26% above |
| 200 week MA | $3.39 | 3.8% below |
TUSK has the edge over VRT on trend strength, trading above more of its moving averages.
VRT Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $221.8 | 5.5% below |
| 20 week MA | $254.4 | 18% below |
| 50 week MA | $253.9 | 17% below |
| 100 week MA | $189.1 | 11% above |
| 200 week MA | $123.5 | 70% above |
VRT has pulled back, but its long-term trend is still up: it's below its 8-, 20- and 50-week averages, but 70% above its 200-week average.
TUSK Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $2.20 | $4.61 | +110% |
| 2021 | $4.61 | $1.91 | -59% |
| 2022 | $1.91 | $7.48 | +292% |
| 2023 | $7.48 | $4.46 | -40% |
| 2024 | $4.46 | $2.71 | -39% |
| 2025 | $2.71 | $1.88 | -31% |
| 2026 YTD | $1.88 | $3.26 | +73% |
TUSK has the edge over VRT on returns for 2026, with the stronger performance.
VRT Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $10.9 | $18.9 | +73% |
| 2021 | $18.9 | $24.9 | +31% |
| 2022 | $24.9 | $12.8 | -48% |
| 2023 | $12.8 | $48.0 | +275% |
| 2024 | $48.0 | $115.1 | +140% |
| 2025 | $115.1 | $167.6 | +46% |
| 2026 YTD | $167.6 | $209.6 | +25% |
VRT's yearly returns have swung widely, from +275% in 2023 to −48% in 2022. It's up 25% so far in 2026.