PYPL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
PYPL's fundamentals are mixed, but it looks cheap: trading at 11x earnings, less than half its usual 26x. Analysts expect earnings growth.
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
There isn't enough reported data to score WULF yet.
PYPL Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Stable | |
| Healthy | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
PYPL's profitability is currently healthy, and its revenue is stable. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like PYPL.
WULF Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Weak | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
WULF's revenue is currently healthy, but its profitability is weak. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like WULF.
PYPL PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward | 9.9x | $58.30 | — |
| Current | 11x | $58.30 | — |
| Cheap | 15x | $76.16 | +31% |
| Fair | 26x | $136 | +133% |
| Expensive | 67x | $351 | +503% |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
PYPL's PE is in its cheap range at 11x. If earnings grow as analysts expect, today's price would be 9.9x next year's earnings.
WULF PE Valuation
WULF has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
PYPL Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| Improving | |
| Growth | |
| Stable | |
| Improving | |
| Moderate | |
| High |
Analysts expect PYPL's earnings to grow and its profitability to improve, with its revenue holding steady.
WULF Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| -- | |
| Losses shrinking | |
| Strong growth | |
| -- | |
| Limited | |
| Low |
Analysts expect WULF's losses to shrink, with revenue growing. However, they disagree widely on these estimates.
PYPL Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $5.87 | +12% |
| Q3 2026 | $5.24 | +5.4% |
| Q2 2026 | $5.29 | +14% |
| Q1 2026 | $5.33 | +20% |
| Q4 2025 | $5.41 | +36% |
| Q3 2025 | $4.97 | +19% |
| Q2 2025 | $4.66 | +13% |
| Q1 2025 | $4.45 | +12% |
| Q4 2024 | $3.99 | +3.9% |
PYPL has the edge over WULF on earnings quality, reporting a profit while its opponent remains loss making.
WULF Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$3.30 | -$1.87 |
| Q2 2026 | -$4.40 | -$4.04 |
| Q1 2026 | -$2.51 | -$2.17 |
| Q4 2025 | -$1.66 | -$1.45 |
| Q3 2025 | -$1.43 | -$1.29 |
| Q2 2025 | -$0.36 | -$0.19 |
| Q1 2025 | -$0.34 | -$0.12 |
| Q4 2024 | -$0.21 | +$0.14 |
WULF lost $3.30 per share over the past year, a bigger loss than the year before.
PYPL Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $8.6B | +2% |
| Q2 2026 | $8.7B | +4.8% |
| Q1 2026 | $8.4B | +7.2% |
| Q4 2025 | $8.7B | +3.7% |
| Q3 2025 | $8.4B | +7.3% |
| Q2 2025 | $8.3B | +5.1% |
| Q1 2025 | $7.8B | +1.2% |
| Q4 2024 | $8.4B | +4.2% |
PYPL's revenue has grown year over year every quarter since late 2020: $8.6B last quarter, up 2% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 16% | -1.7 points |
| Q2 2026 | 16% | -1.7 points |
| Q1 2026 | 18% | -1.8 points |
| Q4 2025 | 17% | +0.2 points |
| Q3 2025 | 18% | +0.3 points |
| Q2 2025 | 18% | +1.3 points |
| Q1 2025 | 20% | +4.5 points |
| Q4 2024 | 17% | -4.3 points |
PYPL has the edge over WULF on profitability, with a higher operating margin.
WULF Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $76.2M | +51% |
| Q2 2026 | $44.8M | -6% |
| Q1 2026 | $34M | -1.1% |
| Q4 2025 | $35.8M | +2.4% |
| Q3 2025 | $50.6M | +87% |
| Q2 2025 | $47.6M | +34% |
| Q1 2025 | $34.4M | -19% |
| Q4 2024 | $35M | +50% |
WULF's revenue is growing: $76M last quarter, up 51% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -116% | -67 points |
| Q2 2026 | -314% | -281 points |
| Q1 2026 | -477% | -303 points |
| Q4 2025 | -241% | -94 points |
| Q3 2025 | -49% | +9.3 points |
| Q2 2025 | -33% | -14 points |
| Q1 2025 | -173% | -168 points |
| Q4 2024 | -147% | -127 points |
WULF's operating margin was −116% last quarter, down 67 points from the same quarter a year ago.
PYPL Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $1.4B | -17% |
| Q2 2026 | $1.8B | +157% |
| Q1 2026 | $903M | -6.3% |
| Q4 2025 | $2.2B | 0% |
| Q3 2025 | $1.7B | +19% |
| Q2 2025 | $692M | -49% |
| Q1 2025 | $964M | -45% |
| Q4 2024 | $2.2B | -11% |
PYPL has the edge over WULF on cash generation, producing positive trailing cash flow while its opponent burns cash.
WULF Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$876.9M | -$608.7M |
| Q2 2026 | -$992.3M | -$817.5M |
| Q1 2026 | -$540.5M | -$503.3M |
| Q4 2025 | -$703.2M | -$506.8M |
| Q3 2025 | -$268.3M | -$226.6M |
| Q2 2025 | -$174.8M | -$144.5M |
| Q1 2025 | -$37.2M | -$13.1M |
| Q4 2024 | -$196.4M | -$173.5M |
WULF's free cash flow was −$3.1B over the past year, against −$677M the year before. Free cash flow isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like WULF.
PYPL Total Shares
| Period | Change % | Net change |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly | -2.7% | -24M shares |
| 1 year | -11% | -102M shares |
| 3 years | -22% | -240M shares |
| 5 years | -28% | -329M shares |
| Available history | -28% | -329M shares |
PYPL has the edge over WULF on shareholder dilution, with a more favorable share count trend.
| Quarter | Spent |
|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $1.5B |
| Q2 2026 | $1.6B |
| Q1 2026 | $1.5B |
| Q4 2025 | $1.5B |
| Q3 2025 | $1.5B |
| Q2 2025 | $1.6B |
| Q1 2025 | $1.5B |
| Q4 2024 | $1.3B |
PYPL spent $6.1B buying back its own shares over the past year, up 4% from the year before.
WULF Total Shares
| Period | Change % | Net change |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly | +18% | +87.9M shares |
| 1 year | +43% | +172M shares |
| 3 years | +173% | +363M shares |
| 5 years | +28923% | +572M shares |
| Available history | +28866% | +572M shares |
WULF has 574M diluted shares, up 43% from a year ago.
| Quarter | Spent |
|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | — |
| Q2 2026 | — |
| Q1 2026 | — |
| Q4 2025 | — |
| Q3 2025 | — |
| Q2 2025 | — |
| Q1 2025 | $33.3M |
| Q4 2021 | — |
WULF hasn't bought back shares in the past year.
PYPL Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 0.9x | Very low |
| Q2 2026 | 0.7x | Very low |
| Q1 2026 | 0.4x | Very low |
| Q4 2025 | 0.3x | Very low |
| Q3 2025 | 0.3x | Very low |
| Q2 2025 | 0.7x | Very low |
| Q1 2025 | 0.6x | Very low |
| Q4 2024 | 0.5x | Very low |
PYPL's net debt is less than a year of its operating earnings (EBITDA). Net leverage isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like PYPL.
WULF Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2024 | -1.0x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2024 | -1.4x | Net Cash |
| Q1 2024 | 3.5x | Elevated |
| Q4 2021 | 32.9x | High |
WULF has more cash than debt. Net leverage isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like WULF.
PYPL Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 58.2 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 61.9 | Neutral |
PYPL's weekly RSI is 58 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 62 (neutral).
WULF Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 40.6 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 24.3 | Neutral |
WULF's weekly RSI is 41 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 24 (neutral).
PYPL PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | PYPL | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11x | 13x | 15% below |
| PE % | 10 | 63 | 53 pts below |
PYPL is trading at 11x earnings, a 15% discount to the Financial Services sector's median of 13x.
WULF PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | WULF | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | N/A | 13x | — |
WULF has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
PYPL Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $56.5 | 3.3% above |
| 20 week MA | $55.5 | 5% above |
| 50 week MA | $51.5 | 13% above |
| 100 week MA | $61.6 | 5.4% below |
| 200 week MA | $64.5 | 9.6% below |
PYPL has bounced recently, but its long-term trend is still down: it's above its 8-, 20- and 50-week averages, but 9.6% below its 200-week average.
WULF Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $13.0 | 0.2% above |
| 20 week MA | $15.9 | 18% below |
| 50 week MA | $17.1 | 24% below |
| 100 week MA | $11.9 | 9.7% above |
| 200 week MA | $7.29 | 79% above |
WULF's trend is mixed: it's above three of its five weekly moving averages, and 79% above its 200-week average.
PYPL Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $109.4 | $238.6 | +118% |
| 2021 | $238.6 | $192.0 | -20% |
| 2022 | $192.0 | $69.0 | -64% |
| 2023 | $69.0 | $61.4 | -11% |
| 2024 | $61.4 | $86.9 | +41% |
| 2025 | $86.9 | $60.0 | -31% |
| 2026 YTD | $60.0 | $58.3 | -2.8% |
PYPL's yearly returns have swung widely, from +118% in 2020 to −64% in 2022. It's down 2.8% so far in 2026.
WULF Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $5.42 | $6.48 | +20% |
| 2021 | $6.48 | $14.4 | +122% |
| 2022 | $14.4 | $0.77 | -95% |
| 2023 | $0.77 | $2.40 | +212% |
| 2024 | $2.40 | $5.53 | +130% |
| 2025 | $5.53 | $11.8 | +112% |
| 2026 YTD | $11.8 | $13.0 | +11% |
WULF has the edge over PYPL on returns for 2026, with the stronger performance.