JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
JPM's fundamentals are strong, but it looks expensive: trading at 14x earnings, above its usual 12x. Analysts expect earnings growth.
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
There isn't enough reported data to score WULF yet.
JPM Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Strong | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
JPM's revenue and profitability are currently healthy. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like JPM.
WULF Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Weak | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
WULF's revenue is currently healthy, but its profitability is weak. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like WULF.
JPM PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap | 9.7x | $231 | -33% |
| Fair | 12x | $287 | -16% |
| Current | 14x | $343 | — |
| Forward | 14x | $343 | — |
| Expensive | 15x | $361 | +5.2% |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
JPM's PE is in its expensive range at 14.4x. If earnings grow as analysts expect, today's price would be 13.7x next year's earnings.
WULF PE Valuation
WULF has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
JPM Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| Stable | |
| Growth | |
| Growth | |
| Improving | |
| Limited | |
| Moderate |
Analysts expect earnings and revenue growth for JPM, with profitability improving.
WULF Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| -- | |
| Losses shrinking | |
| Strong growth | |
| -- | |
| Limited | |
| Low |
Analysts expect WULF's losses to shrink, with revenue growing. However, they disagree widely on these estimates.
JPM Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $24.99 | +4.8% |
| Q3 2026 | $23.85 | +18% |
| Q2 2026 | $23.35 | +20% |
| Q1 2026 | $20.89 | +2.5% |
| Q4 2025 | $20.02 | +1.4% |
| Q3 2025 | $20.20 | +12% |
| Q2 2025 | $19.50 | +8.7% |
| Q1 2025 | $20.38 | +23% |
| Q4 2024 | $19.75 | +22% |
JPM has the edge over WULF on earnings quality, reporting a profit while its opponent remains loss making.
WULF Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$3.30 | -$1.87 |
| Q2 2026 | -$4.40 | -$4.04 |
| Q1 2026 | -$2.51 | -$2.17 |
| Q4 2025 | -$1.66 | -$1.45 |
| Q3 2025 | -$1.43 | -$1.29 |
| Q2 2025 | -$0.36 | -$0.19 |
| Q1 2025 | -$0.34 | -$0.12 |
| Q4 2024 | -$0.21 | +$0.14 |
WULF lost $3.30 per share over the past year, a bigger loss than the year before.
JPM Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $50.2B | +8.1% |
| Q2 2026 | $57.3B | +28% |
| Q1 2026 | $49.8B | +10% |
| Q4 2025 | $45.8B | +7.1% |
| Q3 2025 | $46.4B | +8.8% |
| Q2 2025 | $44.9B | -11% |
| Q1 2025 | $45.3B | +8.1% |
| Q4 2024 | $42.8B | +11% |
JPM's revenue has grown year over year for five quarters in a row: $50.2B last quarter, up 8.1% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 40% | -0.2 points |
| Q2 2026 | 48% | +7.3 points |
| Q1 2026 | 41% | +0.5 points |
| Q4 2025 | 37% | -3.2 points |
| Q3 2025 | 40% | +0.6 points |
| Q2 2025 | 41% | -6 points |
| Q1 2025 | 41% | -0.6 points |
| Q4 2024 | 41% | +11 points |
JPM has the edge over WULF on profitability, with a higher operating margin.
WULF Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $76.2M | +51% |
| Q2 2026 | $44.8M | -6% |
| Q1 2026 | $34M | -1.1% |
| Q4 2025 | $35.8M | +2.4% |
| Q3 2025 | $50.6M | +87% |
| Q2 2025 | $47.6M | +34% |
| Q1 2025 | $34.4M | -19% |
| Q4 2024 | $35M | +50% |
WULF's revenue is growing: $76M last quarter, up 51% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -116% | -67 points |
| Q2 2026 | -314% | -281 points |
| Q1 2026 | -477% | -303 points |
| Q4 2025 | -241% | -94 points |
| Q3 2025 | -49% | +9.3 points |
| Q2 2025 | -33% | -14 points |
| Q1 2025 | -173% | -168 points |
| Q4 2024 | -147% | -127 points |
WULF's operating margin was −116% last quarter, down 67 points from the same quarter a year ago.
JPM Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $33.2B | +$78.4B |
| Q2 2026 | -$25.3B | -186% |
| Q1 2026 | -$211.8B | +$40.1B |
| Q4 2025 | $119.7B | -19% |
| Q3 2025 | -$45.2B | +$28.9B |
| Q2 2025 | $29.5B | -23% |
| Q1 2025 | -$251.8B | -$97.7B |
| Q4 2024 | $147.8B | +145% |
JPM has the edge over WULF on cash flow, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
WULF Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$876.9M | -$608.7M |
| Q2 2026 | -$992.3M | -$817.5M |
| Q1 2026 | -$540.5M | -$503.3M |
| Q4 2025 | -$703.2M | -$506.8M |
| Q3 2025 | -$268.3M | -$226.6M |
| Q2 2025 | -$174.8M | -$144.5M |
| Q1 2025 | -$37.2M | -$13.1M |
| Q4 2024 | -$196.4M | -$173.5M |
WULF's free cash flow was −$3.1B over the past year, against −$677M the year before. Free cash flow isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like WULF.
JPM Total Shares
| Period | Change % | Net change |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly | -0.4% | -11.2M shares |
| 1 year | -3.1% | -84.6M shares |
| 3 years | -8.5% | -249M shares |
| 5 years | -11% | -322M shares |
| Available history | -17% | -547M shares |
JPM has the edge over WULF on shareholder dilution, with a more favorable share count trend.
| Quarter | Spent |
|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $1.1B |
| Q2 2026 | $6.8B |
| Q1 2026 | $8.3B |
| Q4 2025 | $8.3B |
| Q3 2025 | $8.3B |
| Q2 2025 | $7.5B |
| Q1 2025 | $7.5B |
| Q4 2024 | $4.3B |
JPM spent $24.5B buying back its own shares over the past year, down 11% from the year before.
WULF Total Shares
| Period | Change % | Net change |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly | +18% | +87.9M shares |
| 1 year | +43% | +172M shares |
| 3 years | +173% | +363M shares |
| 5 years | +28923% | +572M shares |
| Available history | +28866% | +572M shares |
WULF has 574M diluted shares, up 43% from a year ago.
| Quarter | Spent |
|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | — |
| Q2 2026 | — |
| Q1 2026 | — |
| Q4 2025 | — |
| Q3 2025 | — |
| Q2 2025 | — |
| Q1 2025 | $33.3M |
| Q4 2021 | — |
WULF hasn't bought back shares in the past year.
JPM Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q2 2026 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q1 2026 | 0.6x | Very low |
| Q4 2025 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q3 2025 | 0.6x | Very low |
| Q2 2025 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q1 2025 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q4 2024 | 0.4x | Very low |
JPM's net debt is less than a year of its operating earnings (EBITDA). Net leverage isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like JPM.
WULF Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2024 | -1.0x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2024 | -1.4x | Net Cash |
| Q1 2024 | 3.5x | Elevated |
| Q4 2021 | 32.9x | High |
WULF has more cash than debt. Net leverage isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like WULF.
JPM Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.8 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 31.5 | Neutral |
JPM's weekly RSI is 55 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 31 (neutral).
WULF Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 40.6 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 24.3 | Neutral |
WULF's weekly RSI is 41 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 24 (neutral).
JPM PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | JPM | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 14x | 13x | 10% above |
| PE % | 76 | 63 | 13 pts above |
JPM is trading at 14x earnings, a 10% premium to the Financial Services sector's median of 13x.
WULF PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | WULF | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | N/A | 13x | — |
WULF has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
JPM Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $336.8 | 1.8% above |
| 20 week MA | $345.3 | 0.7% below |
| 50 week MA | $323.2 | 6.1% above |
| 100 week MA | $298.9 | 15% above |
| 200 week MA | $236.6 | 45% above |
JPM has the edge over WULF on trend strength, trading above more of its moving averages.
WULF Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $13.0 | 0.2% above |
| 20 week MA | $15.9 | 18% below |
| 50 week MA | $17.1 | 24% below |
| 100 week MA | $11.9 | 9.7% above |
| 200 week MA | $7.29 | 79% above |
WULF's trend is mixed: it's above three of its five weekly moving averages, and 79% above its 200-week average.
JPM Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $139.1 | $124.5 | -11% |
| 2021 | $124.5 | $157.3 | +26% |
| 2022 | $157.3 | $131.3 | -17% |
| 2023 | $131.3 | $170.1 | +30% |
| 2024 | $170.1 | $241.2 | +42% |
| 2025 | $241.2 | $327.9 | +36% |
| 2026 YTD | $327.9 | $342.8 | +4.5% |
JPM has finished higher in four of the last six years. It's up 4.5% so far in 2026.
WULF Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $5.42 | $6.48 | +20% |
| 2021 | $6.48 | $14.4 | +122% |
| 2022 | $14.4 | $0.77 | -95% |
| 2023 | $0.77 | $2.40 | +212% |
| 2024 | $2.40 | $5.53 | +130% |
| 2025 | $5.53 | $11.8 | +112% |
| 2026 YTD | $11.8 | $13.0 | +11% |
WULF has the edge over JPM on returns for 2026, with the stronger performance.