EBAY
eBay Inc.
EBAY has the edge over RGS overall, supported by lower modeled downside and stronger modeled upside.
RGS
Regis Corporation
RGS trails on the overall score without a compensating advantage in the available component scores.
EBAY Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Healthy | |
| Strong | |
| Stable |
EBAY's revenue, profitability and cash flow are currently healthy, and its balance sheet is stable.
RGS Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Under pressure | |
| Stable | |
| Stable | |
| Under pressure |
RGS's profitability and cash flow are currently stable, but its revenue and balance sheet are under pressure.
EBAY PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap | 6.9x | $31.50 | -74% |
| Fair | 16x | $71.96 | -40% |
| Forward | 18x | $120 | — |
| Expensive | 22x | $99.04 | -18% |
| Current | 26x | $120 | — |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
EBAY has the edge over RGS in the historical PE scenario, which offers more potential upside but is not a forecast.
RGS PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap | 0.5x | $1.05 | -96% |
| Fair | 0.6x | $1.27 | -95% |
| Expensive | 0.7x | $1.39 | -94% |
| Current | 11x | $23.55 | — |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
RGS's PE is in its expensive range at 11x.
EBAY Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| Strongly improving | |
| Growth | |
| Growth | |
| Stable | |
| Moderate | |
| Moderate |
Analysts expect earnings and revenue growth for EBAY, with profitability holding steady.
RGS Forward outlook
There aren't enough analyst estimates for RGS to show an outlook.
EBAY Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $6.63 | +45% |
| Q3 2026 | $4.57 | +0.4% |
| Q2 2026 | $4.82 | +7.3% |
| Q1 2026 | $4.40 | +6% |
| Q4 2025 | $4.34 | +10% |
| Q3 2025 | $4.55 | +15% |
| Q2 2025 | $4.49 | -12% |
| Q1 2025 | $4.15 | -17% |
| Q4 2024 | $3.94 | -24% |
EBAY's earnings per share have fallen from their peak: $4.57 over the past year, against $20.25 in late 2021.
RGS Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $2.10 | -96% |
| Q2 2026 | $2.41 | -95% |
| Q1 2026 | $44.58 | +9.4% |
| Q4 2025 | $44.40 | +12% |
| Q3 2025 | $46.95 | +26% |
| Q2 2025 | $46.10 | +20% |
| Q1 2025 | $40.74 | +$42.71 |
| Q4 2024 | $39.66 | +$41.43 |
RGS has the edge over EBAY on earnings, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
EBAY Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $3.2B | +14% |
| Q2 2026 | $3.1B | +15% |
| Q1 2026 | $3.1B | +19% |
| Q4 2025 | $3B | +15% |
| Q3 2025 | $2.8B | +9.5% |
| Q2 2025 | $2.7B | +6.1% |
| Q1 2025 | $2.6B | +1.1% |
| Q4 2024 | $2.6B | +0.7% |
EBAY has the edge over RGS on sales, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 19% | -1.2 points |
| Q2 2026 | 22% | +3.8 points |
| Q1 2026 | 20% | -4 points |
| Q4 2025 | 20% | -0.8 points |
| Q3 2025 | 20% | -2.7 points |
| Q2 2025 | 18% | -3.6 points |
| Q1 2025 | 24% | -0.9 points |
| Q4 2024 | 21% | +5.1 points |
EBAY has the edge over RGS on profitability, with a higher operating margin.
RGS Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $54.3M | -7.8% |
| Q2 2026 | $56M | -7.3% |
| Q1 2026 | $52.4M | -8% |
| Q4 2025 | $57.1M | +22% |
| Q3 2025 | $59M | +28% |
| Q2 2025 | $60.4M | +22% |
| Q1 2025 | $57M | +16% |
| Q4 2024 | $46.7M | -8.5% |
RGS's revenue fell from its 2019 peak and has held roughly level since: $54M last quarter, down 7.8% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 9.8% | -0.3 points |
| Q2 2026 | 12% | -0.3 points |
| Q1 2026 | 11% | +2.1 points |
| Q4 2025 | 11% | -0.9 points |
| Q3 2025 | 10% | +5.4 points |
| Q2 2025 | 12% | +2.8 points |
| Q1 2025 | 8.8% | +0.5 points |
| Q4 2024 | 12% | +2.4 points |
RGS's operating margin was 9.8% last quarter, about level with the same quarter a year ago.
EBAY Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $749M | -6.7% |
| Q2 2026 | $300M | +$741M |
| Q1 2026 | $897M | +39% |
| Q4 2025 | $466M | -17% |
| Q3 2025 | $803M | +24% |
| Q2 2025 | -$441M | -259% |
| Q1 2025 | $644M | +36% |
| Q4 2024 | $560M | +$564M |
EBAY generated $2.4B in free cash flow over the past year, up 54% from the year before.
RGS Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $2.1M | +11% |
| Q2 2026 | $3.6M | -42% |
| Q1 2026 | $4.8M | -19% |
| Q4 2025 | $891K | -48% |
| Q3 2025 | $1.9M | +$3.2M |
| Q2 2025 | $6.2M | +23% |
| Q1 2025 | $5.9M | +$6.2M |
| Q4 2024 | $1.7M | +$5.9M |
RGS has burned cash in most quarters: $11M over the past year, down 28% from the year before.
EBAY Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 1.9x | Healthy |
| Q2 2026 | 1.5x | Healthy |
| Q1 2026 | 1.4x | Healthy |
| Q4 2025 | 1.8x | Healthy |
| Q3 2025 | 1.7x | Healthy |
| Q2 2025 | 1.8x | Healthy |
| Q1 2025 | 1.4x | Healthy |
| Q4 2024 | 1.9x | Healthy |
EBAY has the edge over RGS on leverage, with a lower net debt burden relative to earnings.
RGS Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 3.2x | Elevated |
| Q2 2026 | 3.2x | Elevated |
| Q1 2026 | 3.2x | Elevated |
| Q4 2025 | 3.4x | Elevated |
| Q3 2025 | 3.5x | Elevated |
| Q2 2025 | 4.1x | High |
| Q1 2025 | 4.8x | High |
| Q4 2024 | 5.2x | High |
RGS's net debt is about 3.2 years of its operating earnings (EBITDA), down from 3.5 years a year ago.
EBAY Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 61.9 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 80.0 | Overbought |
EBAY's weekly RSI is 62 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 80 (overbought).
RGS Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 36.3 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 35.1 | Neutral |
RGS's weekly RSI is 36 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 35 (neutral).
EBAY PE vs Consumer Cyclical Sector
| Metric | EBAY | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 26x | 18x | 46% above |
| PE % | 91 | 47 | 44 pts above |
EBAY is trading at 26x earnings, a 46% premium to the Consumer Cyclical sector's median of 18x.
RGS PE vs Consumer Cyclical Sector
| Metric | RGS | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 11x | 18x | 38% below |
| PE % | 92 | 47 | 45 pts above |
RGS has the edge over EBAY on valuation relative to its sector.
EBAY Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $116.5 | 3.1% above |
| 20 week MA | $112.4 | 6.9% above |
| 50 week MA | $102.6 | 17% above |
| 100 week MA | $89.8 | 34% above |
| 200 week MA | $69.5 | 73% above |
EBAY has the edge over RGS on trend strength, trading above more of its moving averages.
RGS Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $27.8 | 15% below |
| 20 week MA | $27.7 | 15% below |
| 50 week MA | $26.5 | 11% below |
| 100 week MA | $24.8 | 5% below |
| 200 week MA | $21.2 | 11% above |
RGS has fallen below most of its moving averages, though it's still 11% above its 200-week average.
EBAY Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $36.1 | $50.1 | +39% |
| 2021 | $50.1 | $64.9 | +29% |
| 2022 | $64.9 | $40.2 | -38% |
| 2023 | $40.2 | $43.6 | +8.6% |
| 2024 | $43.6 | $62.8 | +44% |
| 2025 | $62.8 | $85.2 | +36% |
| 2026 YTD | $85.2 | $120.1 | +41% |
EBAY has the edge over RGS on returns for 2026, with the stronger performance.
RGS Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $359.0 | $189.6 | -47% |
| 2021 | $189.6 | $33.8 | -82% |
| 2022 | $33.8 | $24.2 | -28% |
| 2023 | $24.2 | $9.45 | -61% |
| 2024 | $9.45 | $25.5 | +170% |
| 2025 | $25.5 | $27.4 | +7.4% |
| 2026 YTD | $27.4 | $23.6 | -14% |
RGS's yearly returns have swung widely, from +170% in 2024 to −82% in 2021. It's down 14% so far in 2026.