CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
CELH's fundamentals are strong and it looks cheap: trading at 35x earnings, less than half its usual 142x. Analysts expect strong earnings growth, though they disagree widely on how much.
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
There isn't enough reported data to score WULF yet.
CELH Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Strong | |
| Stable | |
| Strong |
CELH's revenue, profitability and balance sheet are currently healthy, and its cash flow is stable.
WULF Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Weak | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
WULF's revenue is currently healthy, but its profitability is weak. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like WULF.
CELH PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward | 21x | $31.89 | — |
| Current | 35x | $31.89 | — |
| Cheap | 40x | $35.95 | +13% |
| Fair | 141x | $127 | +299% |
| Expensive | 650x | $585 | +1735% |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
CELH's PE is in its cheap range at 35x. If earnings grow as analysts expect, today's price would be 21x next year's earnings.
WULF PE Valuation
WULF has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
CELH Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| Strongly improving | |
| Strong growth | |
| Growth | |
| Improving | |
| Limited | |
| Low |
Analysts expect earnings and revenue growth for CELH, with profitability improving. However, they disagree widely on these estimates.
WULF Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| -- | |
| Losses shrinking | |
| Strong growth | |
| -- | |
| Limited | |
| Low |
Analysts expect WULF's losses to shrink, with revenue growing. However, they disagree widely on these estimates.
CELH Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $1.53 | +70% |
| Q3 2026 | $0.90 | +718% |
| Q2 2026 | $0.24 | -37% |
| Q1 2026 | $0.43 | +30% |
| Q4 2025 | $0.25 | -44% |
| Q3 2025 | $0.11 | -85% |
| Q2 2025 | $0.38 | -62% |
| Q1 2025 | $0.33 | -64% |
| Q4 2024 | $0.45 | -42% |
CELH has the edge over WULF on earnings quality, reporting a profit while its opponent remains loss making.
WULF Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$3.30 | -$1.87 |
| Q2 2026 | -$4.40 | -$4.04 |
| Q1 2026 | -$2.51 | -$2.17 |
| Q4 2025 | -$1.66 | -$1.45 |
| Q3 2025 | -$1.43 | -$1.29 |
| Q2 2025 | -$0.36 | -$0.19 |
| Q1 2025 | -$0.34 | -$0.12 |
| Q4 2024 | -$0.21 | +$0.14 |
WULF lost $3.30 per share over the past year, a bigger loss than the year before.
CELH Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $847.2M | +17% |
| Q2 2026 | $817.9M | +11% |
| Q1 2026 | $782.6M | +138% |
| Q4 2025 | $721.6M | +117% |
| Q3 2025 | $725.1M | +173% |
| Q2 2025 | $739.3M | +84% |
| Q1 2025 | $329.3M | -7.4% |
| Q4 2024 | $332.2M | -4.4% |
CELH has the edge over WULF on sales, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 20% | +31 points |
| Q2 2026 | 9.2% | -10 points |
| Q1 2026 | 18% | +2 points |
| Q4 2025 | 3.6% | +9.2 points |
| Q3 2025 | -11% | -9.8 points |
| Q2 2025 | 19% | -4.1 points |
| Q1 2025 | 16% | -7.6 points |
| Q4 2024 | -5.6% | -23 points |
CELH has the edge over WULF on profitability, with a higher operating margin.
WULF Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $76.2M | +51% |
| Q2 2026 | $44.8M | -6% |
| Q1 2026 | $34M | -1.1% |
| Q4 2025 | $35.8M | +2.4% |
| Q3 2025 | $50.6M | +87% |
| Q2 2025 | $47.6M | +34% |
| Q1 2025 | $34.4M | -19% |
| Q4 2024 | $35M | +50% |
WULF's revenue is growing: $76M last quarter, up 51% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -116% | -67 points |
| Q2 2026 | -314% | -281 points |
| Q1 2026 | -477% | -303 points |
| Q4 2025 | -241% | -94 points |
| Q3 2025 | -49% | +9.3 points |
| Q2 2025 | -33% | -14 points |
| Q1 2025 | -173% | -168 points |
| Q4 2024 | -147% | -127 points |
WULF's operating margin was −116% last quarter, down 67 points from the same quarter a year ago.
CELH Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $127.7M | -60% |
| Q2 2026 | $205.5M | +479% |
| Q1 2026 | $65.8M | -32% |
| Q4 2025 | -$130M | -285% |
| Q3 2025 | $321.5M | +3599% |
| Q2 2025 | $35.5M | +17% |
| Q1 2025 | $96.4M | -26% |
| Q4 2024 | $70.3M | +16394% |
CELH has the edge over WULF on cash generation, producing positive trailing cash flow while its opponent burns cash.
WULF Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$876.9M | -$608.7M |
| Q2 2026 | -$992.3M | -$817.5M |
| Q1 2026 | -$540.5M | -$503.3M |
| Q4 2025 | -$703.2M | -$506.8M |
| Q3 2025 | -$268.3M | -$226.6M |
| Q2 2025 | -$174.8M | -$144.5M |
| Q1 2025 | -$37.2M | -$13.1M |
| Q4 2024 | -$196.4M | -$173.5M |
WULF's free cash flow was −$3.1B over the past year, against −$677M the year before. Free cash flow isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like WULF.
CELH Total Shares
| Period | Change % | Net change |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly | -0.8% | -2M shares |
| 1 year | -1.1% | -2.9M shares |
| 3 years | +7.4% | +17.6M shares |
| 5 years | +8.3% | +19.5M shares |
| Available history | +32% | +62.4M shares |
CELH has the edge over WULF on shareholder dilution, with a more favorable share count trend.
| Quarter | Spent |
|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $300,000 |
| Q2 2026 | $1M |
| Q1 2026 | $8.8M |
| Q4 2025 | $2.5M |
| Q3 2025 | $448,000 |
| Q2 2025 | $879,000 |
| Q1 2025 | $1.9M |
| Q4 2024 | $603,000 |
CELH spent $13M buying back its own shares over the past year, about three times what it spent the year before.
WULF Total Shares
| Period | Change % | Net change |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly | +18% | +87.9M shares |
| 1 year | +43% | +172M shares |
| 3 years | +173% | +363M shares |
| 5 years | +28923% | +572M shares |
| Available history | +28866% | +572M shares |
WULF has 574M diluted shares, up 43% from a year ago.
| Quarter | Spent |
|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | — |
| Q2 2026 | — |
| Q1 2026 | — |
| Q4 2025 | — |
| Q3 2025 | — |
| Q2 2025 | — |
| Q1 2025 | $33.3M |
| Q4 2021 | — |
WULF hasn't bought back shares in the past year.
CELH Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -0.1x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2026 | 0.2x | Very low |
| Q1 2026 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q4 2025 | 1.6x | Healthy |
| Q3 2025 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q2 2025 | 1.4x | Healthy |
| Q1 2025 | -7.3x | Net Cash |
| Q4 2024 | -5.5x | Net Cash |
CELH has more cash than debt.
WULF Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2024 | -1.0x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2024 | -1.4x | Net Cash |
| Q1 2024 | 3.5x | Elevated |
| Q4 2021 | 32.9x | High |
WULF has more cash than debt. Net leverage isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like WULF.
CELH Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 51.3 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 56.8 | Neutral |
CELH's weekly RSI is 51 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 57 (neutral).
WULF Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 40.6 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 24.3 | Neutral |
WULF's weekly RSI is 41 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 24 (neutral).
CELH PE vs Consumer Defensive Sector
| Metric | CELH | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 35x | 19x | 82% above |
| PE % | 11 | 18 | 7 pts below |
CELH is trading at 35x earnings, a 82% premium to the Consumer Defensive sector's median of 19x.
WULF PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | WULF | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | N/A | 13x | — |
WULF has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
CELH Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $29.1 | 9.4% above |
| 20 week MA | $29.6 | 7.8% above |
| 50 week MA | $36.1 | 12% below |
| 100 week MA | $38.8 | 18% below |
| 200 week MA | $44.6 | 29% below |
CELH has bounced recently, but its long-term trend is still down: it's above its 8- and 20-week averages, but 29% below its 200-week average.
WULF Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $13.0 | 0.2% above |
| 20 week MA | $15.9 | 18% below |
| 50 week MA | $17.1 | 24% below |
| 100 week MA | $11.9 | 9.7% above |
| 200 week MA | $7.29 | 79% above |
WULF has the edge over CELH on trend strength, trading above more of its moving averages.
CELH Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $1.58 | $14.7 | +832% |
| 2021 | $14.7 | $24.9 | +69% |
| 2022 | $24.9 | $35.6 | +43% |
| 2023 | $35.6 | $54.5 | +53% |
| 2024 | $54.5 | $26.5 | -51% |
| 2025 | $26.5 | $45.6 | +72% |
| 2026 YTD | $45.6 | $31.9 | -30% |
CELH's yearly returns have swung widely, from +832% in 2020 to −51% in 2024. It's down 30% so far in 2026.
WULF Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $5.42 | $6.48 | +20% |
| 2021 | $6.48 | $14.4 | +122% |
| 2022 | $14.4 | $0.77 | -95% |
| 2023 | $0.77 | $2.40 | +212% |
| 2024 | $2.40 | $5.53 | +130% |
| 2025 | $5.53 | $11.8 | +112% |
| 2026 YTD | $11.8 | $13.0 | +11% |
WULF has the edge over CELH on returns for 2026, with the stronger performance.