CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
CELH has the edge over SENEA overall, supported by stronger valuation and stronger modeled upside.
SENEA
Seneca Foods Corporation
SENEA has slightly lower modeled downside risk, despite its lower overall score.
CELH Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Strong | |
| Stable | |
| Strong |
CELH's revenue, profitability and balance sheet are currently healthy, and its cash flow is stable.
SENEA Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Healthy | |
| Stable | |
| Healthy |
SENEA's revenue, profitability and balance sheet are currently healthy, and its cash flow is stable.
CELH PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward | 21x | $31.89 | — |
| Current | 35x | $31.89 | — |
| Cheap | 40x | $35.95 | +13% |
| Fair | 141x | $127 | +299% |
| Expensive | 650x | $585 | +1735% |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
CELH has the edge over SENEA in the historical PE scenario, which offers more potential upside but is not a forecast.
SENEA PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap | 4.4x | $75.84 | -55% |
| Current | 9.7x | $169 | — |
| Fair | 10x | $178 | +5.4% |
| Expensive | 15x | $259 | +53% |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
SENEA's PE is 9.7x, but its earnings don't support one, so it isn't a reliable read right now.
CELH Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| Strongly improving | |
| Strong growth | |
| Growth | |
| Improving | |
| Limited | |
| Low |
Analysts expect earnings and revenue growth for CELH, with profitability improving. However, they disagree widely on these estimates.
SENEA Forward outlook
There aren't enough analyst estimates for SENEA to show an outlook.
CELH Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $1.53 | +70% |
| Q3 2026 | $0.90 | +718% |
| Q2 2026 | $0.24 | -37% |
| Q1 2026 | $0.43 | +30% |
| Q4 2025 | $0.25 | -44% |
| Q3 2025 | $0.11 | -85% |
| Q2 2025 | $0.38 | -62% |
| Q1 2025 | $0.33 | -64% |
| Q4 2024 | $0.45 | -42% |
CELH earned $0.90 per share over the past year, about eight times what it earned the year before.
SENEA Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $17.28 | +100% |
| Q2 2026 | $17.30 | +177% |
| Q1 2026 | $16.59 | +181% |
| Q4 2025 | $13.01 | +132% |
| Q3 2025 | $8.63 | +45% |
| Q2 2025 | $6.24 | -15% |
| Q1 2025 | $5.90 | -31% |
| Q4 2022 | $6.18 | -6.5% |
SENEA has the edge over CELH on earnings, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
CELH Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $847.2M | +17% |
| Q2 2026 | $817.9M | +11% |
| Q1 2026 | $782.6M | +138% |
| Q4 2025 | $721.6M | +117% |
| Q3 2025 | $725.1M | +173% |
| Q2 2025 | $739.3M | +84% |
| Q1 2025 | $329.3M | -7.4% |
| Q4 2024 | $332.2M | -4.4% |
CELH's revenue has grown year over year for six quarters in a row: $847M last quarter, up 17% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 20% | +31 points |
| Q2 2026 | 9.2% | -10 points |
| Q1 2026 | 18% | +2 points |
| Q4 2025 | 3.6% | +9.2 points |
| Q3 2025 | -11% | -9.8 points |
| Q2 2025 | 19% | -4.1 points |
| Q1 2025 | 16% | -7.6 points |
| Q4 2024 | -5.6% | -23 points |
CELH has the edge over SENEA on profitability, with a higher operating margin.
SENEA Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $492.6M | +7.1% |
| Q2 2026 | $405.2M | +36% |
| Q1 2026 | $393.8M | +14% |
| Q4 2025 | $508.3M | +1.1% |
| Q3 2025 | $460M | +8.1% |
| Q2 2025 | $297.5M | -2.4% |
| Q1 2025 | $345.8M | +12% |
| Q4 2024 | $502.9M | +13% |
SENEA's revenue has grown year over year for five quarters in a row: $493M last quarter, up 7.1% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 7.6% | -1.4 points |
| Q2 2026 | 6.5% | -1.3 points |
| Q1 2026 | 6% | +5.5 points |
| Q4 2025 | 12% | +6.7 points |
| Q3 2025 | 9% | +3.2 points |
| Q2 2025 | 7.8% | -0.5 points |
| Q1 2025 | 0.6% | -0.3 points |
| Q4 2024 | 5.1% | -1.8 points |
SENEA's operating margin was 7.6% last quarter, down 1.4 points from the same quarter a year ago.
CELH Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $127.7M | -60% |
| Q2 2026 | $205.5M | +479% |
| Q1 2026 | $65.8M | -32% |
| Q4 2025 | -$130M | -285% |
| Q3 2025 | $321.5M | +3599% |
| Q2 2025 | $35.5M | +17% |
| Q1 2025 | $96.4M | -26% |
| Q4 2024 | $70.3M | +16394% |
CELH still generates free cash flow, though less than at its 2025 peak: $269M over the past year.
SENEA Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$45.5M | -309% |
| Q2 2026 | $91.9M | +117% |
| Q1 2026 | $93.1M | +14% |
| Q4 2025 | $22.9M | -79% |
| Q3 2025 | $21.8M | -69% |
| Q2 2025 | $42.4M | +11% |
| Q1 2025 | $81.4M | +102% |
| Q4 2024 | $108.7M | +$215.9M |
SENEA has the edge over CELH on cash flow, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
CELH Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -0.1x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2026 | 0.2x | Very low |
| Q1 2026 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q4 2025 | 1.6x | Healthy |
| Q3 2025 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q2 2025 | 1.4x | Healthy |
| Q1 2025 | -7.3x | Net Cash |
| Q4 2024 | -5.5x | Net Cash |
CELH has the edge over SENEA on leverage, with a lower net debt burden relative to earnings.
SENEA Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 0.9x | Very low |
| Q2 2026 | 0.7x | Very low |
| Q1 2026 | -0.1x | Net Cash |
| Q4 2025 | 1.4x | Healthy |
| Q3 2025 | 1.9x | Healthy |
| Q2 2025 | 2.3x | Moderate |
| Q1 2025 | 2.7x | Moderate |
| Q4 2024 | 3.5x | Elevated |
SENEA's net debt is less than a year of its operating earnings (EBITDA), down from 1.9 years a year ago.
CELH Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 51.3 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 56.8 | Neutral |
CELH's weekly RSI is 51 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 57 (neutral).
SENEA Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 51.2 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 25.4 | Neutral |
SENEA's weekly RSI is 51 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 25 (neutral).
CELH PE vs Consumer Defensive Sector
| Metric | CELH | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 35x | 19x | 82% above |
| PE % | 11 | 18 | 7 pts below |
CELH is trading at 35x earnings, a 82% premium to the Consumer Defensive sector's median of 19x.
SENEA PE vs Consumer Defensive Sector
| Metric | SENEA | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 9.7x | 19x | 50% below |
| PE % | 42 | 18 | 24 pts above |
SENEA has the edge over CELH on valuation relative to its sector.
CELH Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $29.1 | 9.4% above |
| 20 week MA | $29.6 | 7.8% above |
| 50 week MA | $36.1 | 12% below |
| 100 week MA | $38.8 | 18% below |
| 200 week MA | $44.6 | 29% below |
CELH has bounced recently, but its long-term trend is still down: it's above its 8- and 20-week averages, but 29% below its 200-week average.
SENEA Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $168.4 | 0.4% above |
| 20 week MA | $177.3 | 4.6% below |
| 50 week MA | $152.1 | 11% above |
| 100 week MA | $123.9 | 36% above |
| 200 week MA | $89.3 | 89% above |
SENEA has the edge over CELH on trend strength, trading above more of its moving averages.
CELH Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $1.58 | $14.7 | +832% |
| 2021 | $14.7 | $24.9 | +69% |
| 2022 | $24.9 | $35.6 | +43% |
| 2023 | $35.6 | $54.5 | +53% |
| 2024 | $54.5 | $26.5 | -51% |
| 2025 | $26.5 | $45.6 | +72% |
| 2026 YTD | $45.6 | $31.9 | -30% |
CELH's yearly returns have swung widely, from +832% in 2020 to −51% in 2024. It's down 30% so far in 2026.
SENEA Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $41.1 | $39.0 | -5% |
| 2021 | $39.0 | $48.0 | +23% |
| 2022 | $48.0 | $61.0 | +27% |
| 2023 | $61.0 | $52.4 | -14% |
| 2024 | $52.4 | $78.4 | +49% |
| 2025 | $78.4 | $109.9 | +40% |
| 2026 YTD | $109.9 | $169.0 | +54% |
SENEA has the edge over CELH on returns for 2026, with the stronger performance.