BHF
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
BHF trails on the overall score without a compensating advantage in the available component scores.
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
GS has the edge over BHF overall, supported by stronger fundamentals and stronger modeled upside.
BHF Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Stable | |
| Stable | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
BHF's revenue and profitability are currently stable. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like BHF.
GS Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Strong | |
| Strong | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
GS's revenue and profitability are currently strong. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like GS.
BHF PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap | 1.7x | $16.67 | -62% |
| Forward | 2.4x | $44.10 | — |
| Fair | 4.4x | $43.35 | -1.7% |
| Current | 4.5x | $44.10 | — |
| Expensive | 7.2x | $70.02 | +59% |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
BHF's PE is in its fair range at 4.5x. On analysts' estimates for next year's earnings, today's price would be 2.4x, in its cheap range.
GS PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap | 7.6x | $528 | -42% |
| Current | 13x | $914 | — |
| Forward | 13x | $914 | — |
| Fair | 14x | $940 | +2.9% |
| Expensive | 17x | $1,214 | +33% |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
GS has the edge over BHF in the historical PE scenario, which offers more potential upside but is not a forecast.
BHF Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| Strongly improving | |
| Decline | |
| Stable | |
| Weakening | |
| Limited | |
| Low |
Analysts expect BHF's earnings and profitability to decline, with its revenue holding steady. However, they disagree widely on these estimates.
GS Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| Stable | |
| Strong growth | |
| Growth | |
| Strongly improving | |
| Limited | |
| Low |
Analysts expect earnings and revenue growth for GS, with profitability improving. However, they disagree widely on these estimates.
BHF Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $18.60 | +91% |
| Q3 2026 | $9.76 | -31% |
| Q2 2026 | $12.44 | +43% |
| Q1 2026 | -$3.07 | -139% |
| Q4 2025 | $5.71 | +23% |
| Q3 2025 | $14.14 | +$34.47 |
| Q2 2025 | $8.72 | +$24.63 |
| Q1 2025 | $7.82 | +$26.86 |
| Q4 2024 | $4.64 | +$23.18 |
BHF's earnings per share have fallen from their peak: $9.76 over the past year, against $46.42 in early 2020.
GS Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $72.35 | +4% |
| Q3 2026 | $69.58 | +41% |
| Q2 2026 | $64.82 | +43% |
| Q1 2026 | $54.75 | +27% |
| Q4 2025 | $51.32 | +27% |
| Q3 2025 | $49.22 | +44% |
| Q2 2025 | $45.37 | +45% |
| Q1 2025 | $43.08 | +68% |
| Q4 2024 | $40.54 | +77% |
GS has the edge over BHF on earnings, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
BHF Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $853M | -53% |
| Q2 2026 | $1.6B | +86% |
| Q1 2026 | $1.5B | -36% |
| Q4 2025 | $1.7B | +40% |
| Q3 2025 | $1.8B | -10% |
| Q2 2025 | $871M | -39% |
| Q1 2025 | $2.4B | +3130% |
| Q4 2024 | $1.2B | -14% |
BHF's revenue has slid since its 2020 peak: $853M last quarter, down 53% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 47% | +15 points |
| Q2 2026 | 76% | +65 points |
| Q1 2026 | -65% | -50 points |
| Q4 2025 | 8.9% | -60 points |
| Q3 2025 | 32% | +23 points |
| Q2 2025 | 11% | +9.7 points |
| Q1 2025 | -15% | +815 points |
| Q4 2024 | 69% | +153 points |
BHF has the edge over GS on profitability, with a higher operating margin.
GS Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $18.7B | +23% |
| Q2 2026 | $20.3B | +39% |
| Q1 2026 | $17.2B | +14% |
| Q4 2025 | $13.5B | -3% |
| Q3 2025 | $15.2B | +20% |
| Q2 2025 | $14.6B | +15% |
| Q1 2025 | $15.1B | +6% |
| Q4 2024 | $13.9B | +23% |
GS has the edge over BHF on sales, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 37% | +2 points |
| Q2 2026 | 42% | +8.1 points |
| Q1 2026 | 38% | +0.2 points |
| Q4 2025 | 44% | +5.6 points |
| Q3 2025 | 36% | +4.1 points |
| Q2 2025 | 34% | +3.2 points |
| Q1 2025 | 37% | +0.6 points |
| Q4 2024 | 38% | +18 points |
GS's operating margin was 37% last quarter, up 2 points from the same quarter a year ago.
BHF Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$476M | -507% |
| Q2 2026 | -$431M | -$430M |
| Q1 2026 | -$221M | -251% |
| Q4 2025 | -$3M | +$115M |
| Q3 2025 | $117M | +388% |
| Q2 2025 | -$1M | -100% |
| Q1 2025 | $146M | +$676M |
| Q4 2024 | -$118M | -178% |
BHF's free cash flow was −$1.1B over the past year, against $144M the year before. Free cash flow isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like BHF.
GS Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $3.7B | +72% |
| Q2 2026 | $5.6B | +7.8% |
| Q1 2026 | -$32.4B | +$5.3B |
| Q4 2025 | -$16.8B | -136% |
| Q3 2025 | $2.1B | +$40.6B |
| Q2 2025 | $5.2B | -6.8% |
| Q1 2025 | -$37.7B | -$9.2B |
| Q4 2024 | $46.2B | +$75.1B |
GS has the edge over BHF on cash flow, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
BHF Net Leverage
GS Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -5.4x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2026 | -6.1x | Net Cash |
| Q1 2026 | -6.7x | Net Cash |
| Q4 2025 | -6.4x | Net Cash |
| Q3 2025 | -3.5x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2025 | -3.1x | Net Cash |
| Q1 2025 | -3.9x | Net Cash |
| Q4 2024 | -4.7x | Net Cash |
GS has more cash than debt. Net leverage isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like GS.
BHF Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 27.9 | Oversold |
| Stochastic | 10.5 | Oversold |
BHF's weekly RSI is 28 (oversold) and its Stochastic is 11 (oversold).
GS Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 44.5 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 16.3 | Oversold |
GS's weekly RSI is 45 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 16 (oversold).
BHF PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | BHF | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 4.5x | 13x | 65% below |
| PE % | 52 | 63 | 11 pts below |
BHF has the edge over GS on valuation relative to its sector.
GS PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | GS | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 13x | 13x | 0.8% above |
| PE % | 46 | 63 | 17 pts below |
GS is trading at 13x earnings, in line with the Financial Services sector's median of 13x, though its earnings don't support one.
BHF Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $47.0 | 6.1% below |
| 20 week MA | $53.7 | 18% below |
| 50 week MA | $59.1 | 25% below |
| 100 week MA | $56.6 | 22% below |
| 200 week MA | $52.3 | 16% below |
BHF is in a downtrend: it's below all five of its weekly moving averages, and 16% below its 200-week average.
GS Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $895.5 | 2% above |
| 20 week MA | $977.4 | 6.5% below |
| 50 week MA | $945.4 | 3.4% below |
| 100 week MA | $804.5 | 14% above |
| 200 week MA | $602.7 | 52% above |
GS has the edge over BHF on trend strength, trading above more of its moving averages.
BHF Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $39.5 | $35.4 | -10% |
| 2021 | $35.4 | $52.2 | +47% |
| 2022 | $52.2 | $51.1 | -2.1% |
| 2023 | $51.1 | $52.9 | +3.5% |
| 2024 | $52.9 | $48.2 | -8.9% |
| 2025 | $48.2 | $64.9 | +34% |
| 2026 YTD | $64.9 | $44.1 | -32% |
BHF has finished lower in three of the last six years. It's down 32% so far in 2026.
GS Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $230.7 | $256.2 | +11% |
| 2021 | $256.2 | $385.0 | +50% |
| 2022 | $385.0 | $345.5 | -10% |
| 2023 | $345.5 | $385.8 | +12% |
| 2024 | $385.8 | $576.2 | +49% |
| 2025 | $576.2 | $907.0 | +57% |
| 2026 YTD | $907.0 | $913.6 | +0.7% |
GS has the edge over BHF on returns for 2026, with the stronger performance.