BAC
Bank of America Corporation
BAC's fundamentals are strong: its operating margin rose 5 points to 35% and revenue grew 15%. At 12x earnings, it's trading in line with its usual 13x. Analysts expect earnings growth.
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
There isn't enough reported data to score WULF yet.
BAC Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Strong | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
BAC's revenue and profitability are currently healthy. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like BAC.
WULF Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Weak | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
WULF's revenue is currently healthy, but its profitability is weak. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like WULF.
BAC PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap | 9.4x | $39.50 | -22% |
| Forward | 10x | $50.51 | โ |
| Current | 12x | $50.51 | โ |
| Fair | 13x | $53.81 | +6.5% |
| Expensive | 15x | $62.23 | +23% |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
BAC's PE is in its fair range at 12x. If earnings grow as analysts expect, today's price would be 10x next year's earnings, in its cheap range.
WULF PE Valuation
WULF has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
BAC Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| Improving | |
| Growth | |
| Growth | |
| Strongly improving | |
| Limited | |
| Moderate |
Analysts expect earnings and revenue growth for BAC, with profitability improving.
WULF Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| -- | |
| Losses shrinking | |
| Strong growth | |
| -- | |
| Limited | |
| Low |
Analysts expect WULF's losses to shrink, with revenue growing. However, they disagree widely on these estimates.
BAC Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $4.92 | +17% |
| Q3 2026 | $4.19 | +14% |
| Q2 2026 | $4.34 | +27% |
| Q1 2026 | $4.02 | +20% |
| Q4 2025 | $3.81 | +19% |
| Q3 2025 | $3.66 | +33% |
| Q2 2025 | $3.41 | +20% |
| Q1 2025 | $3.35 | +16% |
| Q4 2024 | $3.21 | +4.2% |
BAC has the edge over WULF on earnings quality, reporting a profit while its opponent remains loss making.
WULF Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$3.30 | -$1.87 |
| Q2 2026 | -$4.40 | -$4.04 |
| Q1 2026 | -$2.51 | -$2.17 |
| Q4 2025 | -$1.66 | -$1.45 |
| Q3 2025 | -$1.43 | -$1.29 |
| Q2 2025 | -$0.36 | -$0.19 |
| Q1 2025 | -$0.34 | -$0.12 |
| Q4 2024 | -$0.21 | +$0.14 |
WULF lost $3.30 per share over the past year, a bigger loss than the year before.
BAC Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $30B | +6.7% |
| Q2 2026 | $31.6B | +19% |
| Q1 2026 | $30.3B | +11% |
| Q4 2025 | $31.2B | +23% |
| Q3 2025 | $28.1B | +11% |
| Q2 2025 | $26.5B | +4.3% |
| Q1 2025 | $27.4B | +6% |
| Q4 2024 | $25.3B | +15% |
BAC's revenue has grown year over year for 10 quarters in a row: $30B last quarter, up 6.7% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 30% | -3.7 points |
| Q2 2026 | 37% | +7.6 points |
| Q1 2026 | 34% | +4.7 points |
| Q4 2025 | 40% | +12 points |
| Q3 2025 | 34% | +4.8 points |
| Q2 2025 | 29% | -0.7 points |
| Q1 2025 | 30% | +1.5 points |
| Q4 2024 | 28% | +14 points |
BAC has the edge over WULF on profitability, with a higher operating margin.
WULF Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $76.2M | +51% |
| Q2 2026 | $44.8M | -6% |
| Q1 2026 | $34M | -1.1% |
| Q4 2025 | $35.8M | +2.4% |
| Q3 2025 | $50.6M | +87% |
| Q2 2025 | $47.6M | +34% |
| Q1 2025 | $34.4M | -19% |
| Q4 2024 | $35M | +50% |
WULF's revenue is growing: $76M last quarter, up 51% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -116% | -67 points |
| Q2 2026 | -314% | -281 points |
| Q1 2026 | -477% | -303 points |
| Q4 2025 | -241% | -94 points |
| Q3 2025 | -49% | +9.3 points |
| Q2 2025 | -33% | -14 points |
| Q1 2025 | -173% | -168 points |
| Q4 2024 | -147% | -127 points |
WULF's operating margin was โ116% last quarter, down 67 points from the same quarter a year ago.
BAC Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$6.5B | -114% |
| Q2 2026 | $29B | +$38.2B |
| Q1 2026 | $41.8B | +$44B |
| Q4 2025 | -$22.9B | -189% |
| Q3 2025 | $46.9B | +$84.2B |
| Q2 2025 | -$9.1B | -150% |
| Q1 2025 | -$2.2B | +$13.4B |
| Q4 2024 | $25.9B | -21% |
BAC has the edge over WULF on cash generation, producing positive trailing cash flow while its opponent burns cash.
WULF Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$876.9M | -$608.7M |
| Q2 2026 | -$992.3M | -$817.5M |
| Q1 2026 | -$540.5M | -$503.3M |
| Q4 2025 | -$703.2M | -$506.8M |
| Q3 2025 | -$268.3M | -$226.6M |
| Q2 2025 | -$174.8M | -$144.5M |
| Q1 2025 | -$37.2M | -$13.1M |
| Q4 2024 | -$196.4M | -$173.5M |
WULF's free cash flow was โ$3.1B over the past year, against โ$677M the year before. Free cash flow isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like WULF.
BAC Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 6.4x | High |
| Q2 2026 | 6.7x | High |
| Q1 2026 | 7.1x | High |
| Q4 2025 | 7.7x | High |
| Q3 2025 | 8.3x | High |
| Q2 2025 | 8.8x | High |
| Q1 2025 | 8.6x | High |
| Q4 2024 | 9.0x | High |
BAC's net debt is about 6.4 years of its operating earnings (EBITDA), down from 8.3 years a year ago. Net leverage isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like BAC.
WULF Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2024 | -1.0x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2024 | -1.4x | Net Cash |
| Q1 2024 | 3.5x | Elevated |
| Q4 2021 | 32.9x | High |
WULF has more cash than debt. Net leverage isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like WULF.
BAC Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 37.1 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 4.9 | Oversold |
BAC's weekly RSI is 37 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 5 (oversold).
WULF Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 40.6 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 24.3 | Neutral |
WULF's weekly RSI is 41 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 24 (neutral).
BAC PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | BAC | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 12x | 13x | 7.5% below |
| PE % | 40 | 63 | 23 pts below |
BAC is trading at 12x earnings, in line with the Financial Services sector's median of 13x.
WULF PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | WULF | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | N/A | 13x | โ |
WULF has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
BAC Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $52.1 | 3% below |
| 20 week MA | $57.8 | 13% below |
| 50 week MA | $54.7 | 7.7% below |
| 100 week MA | $50.5 | 0% below |
| 200 week MA | $42.5 | 19% above |
BAC has fallen below most of its moving averages, though it's still 19% above its 200-week average.
WULF Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $13.0 | 0.2% above |
| 20 week MA | $15.9 | 18% below |
| 50 week MA | $17.1 | 24% below |
| 100 week MA | $11.9 | 9.7% above |
| 200 week MA | $7.29 | 79% above |
WULF has the edge over BAC on trend strength, trading above more of its moving averages.
BAC Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $35.4 | $30.0 | -15% |
| 2021 | $30.0 | $44.4 | +48% |
| 2022 | $44.4 | $32.5 | -27% |
| 2023 | $32.5 | $33.7 | +3.7% |
| 2024 | $33.7 | $44.3 | +32% |
| 2025 | $44.3 | $56.2 | +27% |
| 2026 YTD | $56.2 | $50.5 | -10% |
BAC has finished higher in four of the last six years. It's down 10% so far in 2026.
WULF Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $5.42 | $6.48 | +20% |
| 2021 | $6.48 | $14.4 | +122% |
| 2022 | $14.4 | $0.77 | -95% |
| 2023 | $0.77 | $2.40 | +212% |
| 2024 | $2.40 | $5.53 | +130% |
| 2025 | $5.53 | $11.8 | +112% |
| 2026 YTD | $11.8 | $13.0 | +11% |
WULF has the edge over BAC on returns for 2026, with the stronger performance.