BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
BABA's fundamentals are weak: its operating margin fell 10 points to 4.2% and free cash flow turned negative, though revenue grew 4.3%. Its PE isn't a useful guide right now because of how its recent earnings were reported.
WULF
TeraWulf Inc.
There isn't enough reported data to score WULF yet.
BABA Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Stable | |
| Under pressure | |
| Weak | |
| Healthy |
BABA's balance sheet is currently healthy, and its revenue is stable, but its profitability and cash flow are under pressure.
WULF Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Weak | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
WULF's revenue is currently healthy, but its profitability is weak. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like WULF.
BABA PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap | 16x | $69.66 | -26% |
| Fair | 20x | $86.59 | -8.2% |
| Current | 21x | $94.36 | — |
| Expensive | 26x | $115 | +22% |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
BABA's PE is 21x, but its earnings don't support one, so it isn't a reliable read right now.
WULF PE Valuation
WULF has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
BABA Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| -- | |
| Strong growth | |
| Growth | |
| Strongly improving | |
| Limited | |
| Low |
Analysts expect earnings and revenue growth for BABA, with profitability improving. However, they disagree widely on these estimates.
WULF Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| -- | |
| Losses shrinking | |
| Strong growth | |
| -- | |
| Limited | |
| Low |
Analysts expect WULF's losses to shrink, with revenue growing. However, they disagree widely on these estimates.
BABA Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | $4.42 | -52% |
| Q1 2026 | $6.57 | -18% |
| Q4 2025 | $5.79 | -22% |
| Q3 2025 | $7.85 | +49% |
| Q2 2025 | $9.27 | +116% |
| Q1 2025 | $8.06 | +71% |
| Q4 2024 | $7.47 | +24% |
| Q3 2024 | $5.26 | -35% |
BABA has the edge over WULF on earnings quality, reporting a profit while its opponent remains loss making.
WULF Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$3.30 | -$1.87 |
| Q2 2026 | -$4.40 | -$4.04 |
| Q1 2026 | -$2.51 | -$2.17 |
| Q4 2025 | -$1.66 | -$1.45 |
| Q3 2025 | -$1.43 | -$1.29 |
| Q2 2025 | -$0.36 | -$0.19 |
| Q1 2025 | -$0.34 | -$0.12 |
| Q4 2024 | -$0.21 | +$0.14 |
WULF lost $3.30 per share over the past year, a bigger loss than the year before.
BABA Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | $40.2B | +8.3% |
| Q1 2026 | $36.5B | +2.9% |
| Q4 2025 | $42.7B | +1.7% |
| Q3 2025 | $37.2B | +4.8% |
| Q2 2025 | $37.2B | +1.8% |
| Q1 2025 | $35.5B | +6.6% |
| Q4 2024 | $42B | +7.6% |
| Q3 2024 | $35.5B | +5.2% |
BABA's revenue has grown year over year for 16 quarters in a row: $40.2B last quarter, up 8.3% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | 7.2% | -6.9 points |
| Q1 2026 | -0.3% | -12 points |
| Q4 2025 | 7.1% | -7.6 points |
| Q3 2025 | 2.2% | -13 points |
| Q2 2025 | 14% | -0.7 points |
| Q1 2025 | 12% | +5.4 points |
| Q4 2024 | 15% | +6.1 points |
| Q3 2024 | 15% | 0 points |
BABA has the edge over WULF on profitability, with a higher operating margin.
WULF Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $76.2M | +51% |
| Q2 2026 | $44.8M | -6% |
| Q1 2026 | $34M | -1.1% |
| Q4 2025 | $35.8M | +2.4% |
| Q3 2025 | $50.6M | +87% |
| Q2 2025 | $47.6M | +34% |
| Q1 2025 | $34.4M | -19% |
| Q4 2024 | $35M | +50% |
WULF's revenue is growing: $76M last quarter, up 51% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -116% | -67 points |
| Q2 2026 | -314% | -281 points |
| Q1 2026 | -477% | -303 points |
| Q4 2025 | -241% | -94 points |
| Q3 2025 | -49% | +9.3 points |
| Q2 2025 | -33% | -14 points |
| Q1 2025 | -173% | -168 points |
| Q4 2024 | -147% | -127 points |
WULF's operating margin was −116% last quarter, down 67 points from the same quarter a year ago.
BABA Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | -$6.7B | -$4.1B |
| Q1 2026 | -$2.7B | +$1.5B |
| Q4 2025 | $1B | -90% |
| Q3 2025 | -$3.2B | -254% |
| Q2 2025 | -$2.7B | -182% |
| Q1 2025 | -$4.2B | -12231% |
| Q4 2024 | $10.4B | -4.8% |
| Q3 2024 | $2.1B | -62% |
BABA has the edge over WULF on cash flow, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
WULF Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -$876.9M | -$608.7M |
| Q2 2026 | -$992.3M | -$817.5M |
| Q1 2026 | -$540.5M | -$503.3M |
| Q4 2025 | -$703.2M | -$506.8M |
| Q3 2025 | -$268.3M | -$226.6M |
| Q2 2025 | -$174.8M | -$144.5M |
| Q1 2025 | -$37.2M | -$13.1M |
| Q4 2024 | -$196.4M | -$173.5M |
WULF's free cash flow was −$3.1B over the past year, against −$677M the year before. Free cash flow isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like WULF.
BABA Total Shares
| Period | Change % | Net change |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly | +0.5% | +11.1M shares |
| 1 year | +0.9% | +21.4M shares |
| 3 years | -6.2% | -161M shares |
| 5 years | -12% | -339M shares |
| Available history | -8.4% | -221M shares |
BABA has the edge over WULF on shareholder dilution, with a more favorable share count trend.
| Quarter | Spent |
|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | — |
| Q1 2026 | — |
| Q4 2025 | — |
| Q3 2025 | $269.8M |
| Q2 2025 | — |
| Q1 2025 | — |
| Q4 2024 | — |
| Q3 2024 | — |
BABA spent $270M buying back its own shares over the past year, after none the year before.
WULF Total Shares
| Period | Change % | Net change |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly | +18% | +87.9M shares |
| 1 year | +43% | +172M shares |
| 3 years | +173% | +363M shares |
| 5 years | +28923% | +572M shares |
| Available history | +28866% | +572M shares |
WULF has 574M diluted shares, up 43% from a year ago.
| Quarter | Spent |
|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | — |
| Q2 2026 | — |
| Q1 2026 | — |
| Q4 2025 | — |
| Q3 2025 | — |
| Q2 2025 | — |
| Q1 2025 | $33.3M |
| Q4 2021 | — |
WULF hasn't bought back shares in the past year.
BABA Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q2 2026 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q1 2026 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q4 2025 | 0.6x | Very low |
| Q3 2025 | 0.8x | Very low |
| Q2 2025 | 0.2x | Very low |
| Q1 2025 | 0.3x | Very low |
| Q4 2024 | 0.1x | Very low |
| Q3 2024 | -0.2x | Net Cash |
BABA's net debt is less than a year of its operating earnings (EBITDA).
WULF Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2024 | -1.0x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2024 | -1.4x | Net Cash |
| Q1 2024 | 3.5x | Elevated |
| Q4 2021 | 32.9x | High |
WULF has more cash than debt. Net leverage isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like WULF.
BABA Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 38.0 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 12.7 | Oversold |
BABA's weekly RSI is 38 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 13 (oversold).
WULF Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 40.6 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 24.3 | Neutral |
WULF's weekly RSI is 41 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 24 (neutral).
BABA PE vs Consumer Cyclical Sector
| Metric | BABA | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 21x | 18x | 19% above |
| PE % | 60 | 47 | 13 pts above |
BABA is trading at 21x earnings, a 19% premium to the Consumer Cyclical sector's median of 18x, though its earnings don't support one.
WULF PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | WULF | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | N/A | 13x | — |
WULF has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
BABA Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $104.7 | 9.9% below |
| 20 week MA | $111.1 | 15% below |
| 50 week MA | $128.0 | 26% below |
| 100 week MA | $127.7 | 26% below |
| 200 week MA | $106.4 | 11% below |
BABA is in a downtrend: it's below all five of its weekly moving averages, and 11% below its 200-week average.
WULF Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $13.0 | 0.2% above |
| 20 week MA | $15.9 | 18% below |
| 50 week MA | $17.1 | 24% below |
| 100 week MA | $11.9 | 9.7% above |
| 200 week MA | $7.29 | 79% above |
WULF has the edge over BABA on trend strength, trading above more of its moving averages.
BABA Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $215.5 | $222.0 | +3% |
| 2021 | $222.0 | $118.7 | -47% |
| 2022 | $118.7 | $85.7 | -28% |
| 2023 | $85.7 | $77.5 | -9.5% |
| 2024 | $77.5 | $85.1 | +9.7% |
| 2025 | $85.1 | $152.2 | +79% |
| 2026 YTD | $152.2 | $94.4 | -38% |
BABA has finished lower in three of the last six years. It's down 38% so far in 2026.
WULF Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $5.42 | $6.48 | +20% |
| 2021 | $6.48 | $14.4 | +122% |
| 2022 | $14.4 | $0.77 | -95% |
| 2023 | $0.77 | $2.40 | +212% |
| 2024 | $2.40 | $5.53 | +130% |
| 2025 | $5.53 | $11.8 | +112% |
| 2026 YTD | $11.8 | $13.0 | +11% |
WULF has the edge over BABA on returns for 2026, with the stronger performance.