APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
APO offers stronger valuation, but that advantage does not outweigh its weaker overall profile.
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
JPM has a slight edge over APO overall, supported by stronger fundamentals and lower modeled downside.
APO Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Stable | |
| Under pressure | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
APO's revenue is currently stable, but its profitability is under pressure. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like APO.
JPM Fundamentals
| Metric | Status |
|---|---|
| Healthy | |
| Strong | |
| N/A | |
| N/A |
JPM's revenue and profitability are currently healthy. Free cash flow and net leverage aren't meaningful measures for financial services companies like JPM.
APO PE Valuation
APO has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
JPM PE Valuation
| Level | PE | Price | Vs current |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap | 9.7x | $231 | -33% |
| Fair | 12x | $287 | -16% |
| Current | 14x | $343 | — |
| Forward | 14x | $343 | — |
| Expensive | 15x | $361 | +5.2% |
Historical ranges are pointers, not guarantees.
JPM's PE is in its expensive range at 14.4x. If earnings grow as analysts expect, today's price would be 13.7x next year's earnings.
APO Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| -- | |
| Strong growth | |
| Strong growth | |
| Stable | |
| Moderate | |
| Moderate |
Analysts expect strong earnings and revenue growth for APO, with profitability holding steady.
JPM Forward outlook
| Metric | Outlook |
|---|---|
| Stable | |
| Growth | |
| Growth | |
| Improving | |
| Limited | |
| Moderate |
JPM has the edge over APO on the outlook, with more favorable profitability expectations.
APO Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $10.14 | — |
| Q3 2026 | -$1.81 | -126% |
| Q2 2026 | $2.75 | -49% |
| Q1 2026 | $1.59 | -72% |
| Q4 2025 | $5.54 | -24% |
| Q3 2025 | $6.86 | -27% |
| Q2 2025 | $5.37 | -42% |
| Q1 2025 | $5.73 | -36% |
| Q4 2024 | $7.33 | -11% |
APO has swung to a loss: it lost $1.81 per share over the past year, after a profit the year before.
JPM Earnings Per Share
| Quarter | TTM EPS | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward | $24.99 | +4.8% |
| Q3 2026 | $23.85 | +18% |
| Q2 2026 | $23.35 | +20% |
| Q1 2026 | $20.89 | +2.5% |
| Q4 2025 | $20.02 | +1.4% |
| Q3 2025 | $20.20 | +12% |
| Q2 2025 | $19.50 | +8.7% |
| Q1 2025 | $20.38 | +23% |
| Q4 2024 | $19.75 | +22% |
JPM has the edge over APO on earnings quality, reporting a profit while its opponent remains loss making.
APO Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $4.7B | -52% |
| Q2 2026 | $11.2B | +64% |
| Q1 2026 | $5.1B | -8.8% |
| Q4 2025 | $9.9B | +87% |
| Q3 2025 | $9.8B | +26% |
| Q2 2025 | $6.8B | +13% |
| Q1 2025 | $5.5B | -21% |
| Q4 2024 | $5.3B | -52% |
APO's revenue is growing: $4.7B last quarter, down 52% from the same quarter a year ago.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -31% | -60 points |
| Q2 2026 | 22% | +9.9 points |
| Q1 2026 | 5.6% | -16 points |
| Q4 2025 | 18% | -15 points |
| Q3 2025 | 30% | +2.7 points |
| Q2 2025 | 12% | -12 points |
| Q1 2025 | 21% | -9.8 points |
| Q4 2024 | 33% | +15 points |
APO's operating margin was −31% last quarter, down 60 points from the same quarter a year ago.
JPM Quarterly Revenue
| Quarter | Revenue | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $50.2B | +8.1% |
| Q2 2026 | $57.3B | +28% |
| Q1 2026 | $49.8B | +10% |
| Q4 2025 | $45.8B | +7.1% |
| Q3 2025 | $46.4B | +8.8% |
| Q2 2025 | $44.9B | -11% |
| Q1 2025 | $45.3B | +8.1% |
| Q4 2024 | $42.8B | +11% |
JPM has the edge over APO on sales, with more consistent year-over-year improvement.
| Quarter | Margin | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 40% | -0.2 points |
| Q2 2026 | 48% | +7.3 points |
| Q1 2026 | 41% | +0.5 points |
| Q4 2025 | 37% | -3.2 points |
| Q3 2025 | 40% | +0.6 points |
| Q2 2025 | 41% | -6 points |
| Q1 2025 | 41% | -0.6 points |
| Q4 2024 | 41% | +11 points |
JPM has the edge over APO on profitability, with a higher operating margin.
APO Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $136M | -55% |
| Q2 2026 | $2.9B | +128% |
| Q1 2026 | $1.6B | +60% |
| Q4 2025 | $4.7B | +$4.7B |
| Q3 2025 | $303M | -84% |
| Q2 2025 | $1.3B | -5.3% |
| Q1 2025 | $1B | +1346% |
| Q4 2024 | -$4M | -100% |
APO has the edge over JPM on cash generation, producing positive trailing cash flow while its opponent burns cash.
JPM Free Cash Flow
| Quarter | Free cash flow | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | $33.2B | +$78.4B |
| Q2 2026 | -$25.3B | -186% |
| Q1 2026 | -$211.8B | +$40.1B |
| Q4 2025 | $119.7B | -19% |
| Q3 2025 | -$45.2B | +$28.9B |
| Q2 2025 | $29.5B | -23% |
| Q1 2025 | -$251.8B | -$97.7B |
| Q4 2024 | $147.8B | +145% |
JPM's free cash flow was −$84.2B over the past year, against −$120B the year before. Free cash flow isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like JPM.
APO Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | -1.7x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2026 | -1.6x | Net Cash |
| Q1 2026 | -1.3x | Net Cash |
| Q4 2025 | -0.9x | Net Cash |
| Q3 2025 | -1.1x | Net Cash |
| Q2 2025 | -0.4x | Net Cash |
| Q1 2025 | -0.7x | Net Cash |
| Q4 2024 | -0.8x | Net Cash |
APO has the edge over JPM on leverage, with a lower net debt burden relative to earnings.
JPM Net Leverage
| Quarter | Net Leverage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2026 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q2 2026 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q1 2026 | 0.6x | Very low |
| Q4 2025 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q3 2025 | 0.6x | Very low |
| Q2 2025 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q1 2025 | 0.5x | Very low |
| Q4 2024 | 0.4x | Very low |
JPM's net debt is less than a year of its operating earnings (EBITDA). Net leverage isn't a meaningful measure for financial services companies like JPM.
APO Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 48.7 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 23.4 | Neutral |
APO's weekly RSI is 49 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 23 (neutral).
JPM Weekly Momentum
| Metric | Value | Status |
|---|---|---|
| RSI | 54.8 | Neutral |
| Stochastic | 31.5 | Neutral |
JPM's weekly RSI is 55 (neutral) and its Stochastic is 31 (neutral).
APO PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | APO | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 42x | 13x | 224% above |
| PE % | 85 | 63 | 22 pts above |
APO has no meaningful PE right now: it lost money over the past year.
JPM PE vs Financial Services Sector
| Metric | JPM | Sector median | Relative |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 14x | 13x | 10% above |
| PE % | 76 | 63 | 13 pts above |
JPM has the edge over APO on valuation relative to its sector.
APO Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $116.5 | 4.2% above |
| 20 week MA | $123.2 | 1.5% below |
| 50 week MA | $126.1 | 3.7% below |
| 100 week MA | $133.4 | 9% below |
| 200 week MA | $116.4 | 4.2% above |
APO's trend is mixed: it's above two of its five weekly moving averages, and 4.2% above its 200-week average.
JPM Weekly Moving Averages
| Moving average | MA price | Relative |
|---|---|---|
| 8 week MA | $336.8 | 1.8% above |
| 20 week MA | $345.3 | 0.7% below |
| 50 week MA | $323.2 | 6.1% above |
| 100 week MA | $298.9 | 15% above |
| 200 week MA | $236.6 | 45% above |
JPM has the edge over APO on trend strength, trading above more of its moving averages.
APO Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $48.1 | $49.1 | +2.1% |
| 2021 | $49.1 | $74.3 | +51% |
| 2022 | $74.3 | $64.3 | -13% |
| 2023 | $64.3 | $93.2 | +45% |
| 2024 | $93.2 | $170.3 | +83% |
| 2025 | $170.3 | $148.5 | -13% |
| 2026 YTD | $148.5 | $121.4 | -18% |
APO has finished higher in four of the last six years, two of them by more than 50%. It's down 18% so far in 2026.
JPM Yearly ROI
| Year | Start price | End price | ROI |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $139.1 | $124.5 | -11% |
| 2021 | $124.5 | $157.3 | +26% |
| 2022 | $157.3 | $131.3 | -17% |
| 2023 | $131.3 | $170.1 | +30% |
| 2024 | $170.1 | $241.2 | +42% |
| 2025 | $241.2 | $327.9 | +36% |
| 2026 YTD | $327.9 | $342.8 | +4.5% |
JPM has the edge over APO on returns for 2026, with the stronger performance.